• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ALCON RESEARCH, LLC - IRVINE TECHNOLOGY CENTER CENTURION VISION SYSTEM, ACCESSORY, ACTIVE SENTRY HANDPIECE; UNIT, PHACOFRAGMENTATION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ALCON RESEARCH, LLC - IRVINE TECHNOLOGY CENTER CENTURION VISION SYSTEM, ACCESSORY, ACTIVE SENTRY HANDPIECE; UNIT, PHACOFRAGMENTATION Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 8065752914
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Corneal Edema (1791); Blurred Vision (2137); Visual Disturbances (2140); Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms, Conditions Term / Code Not Available (4581)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation including root cause analysis is in progress.A supplemental mdr will be filed as necessary in accordance with 21 cfr 803.56 when additional reportable information becomes available.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
 
Event Description
A healthcare professional reported that after using ophthalmic handpiece and console in a cataract surgeries patient experienced corneal edema with corneal opacity after two weeks post operation and it lead to loss of best corrected visual acuity.The patient's current conditions were improving slowly.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
 
Event Description
A physician reported that a patient with a grade three cataract underwent cataract surgery with monofocal lens implantation using an ophthalmic operating handpiece.At one-week post-op, the patient exhibited corneal edema with visual disturbance in the left eye, for which the patient was treated with corticosteroids eye drops.The physician saw the patient at three months follow up from procedure and it was observed that the patient had not yet recovered.In the fourth month patient was fully recovered.This complaint is pertaining the first of two reports received from the initial reporter.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information provided in sections d.9.H.3.H.6 and h.11.The product under investigation is not a serviceable device.Therefore, a service record review was not performed.However, a handpiece (hp) was returned for this investigation.A non-conformance based review of the serial number was performed and did not reveal any potential contributing factors to the reported complaint.A manufacturing device history record (dhr) review was performed prior to product release to ensure that the product was manufactured in compliance with the device master record.Based on the assessment, the product met release criteria.A review for complaints reported against this serial number was performed.Quality summaries (qs¿s) were opened for the events that occurred with the demo and replacement systems, and at other dates with different patients.The investigations will mirror this investigation.The investigation logs for the handpiece are documented in the first qs opened.The hp was received for testing on this investigation.A visual assessment of the returned sample revealed no obvious non-conformities.The handpiece was connected to a calibrated resistance breakout test box, where the connection between the input and output impedance of the sensor was found to be within specifications.When the handpiece was connected to a calibrated breakout test box, both the resistance and dissipation between low electrode and high electrode were found to be out of specifications.A flow rate test was performed on the irrigation and aspiration lines of the handpiece which found the handpiece to fail specifications.The handpiece channels were inspected with a borescope which revealed no obvious nonconformities.The returned sample was connected to a calibrated system.The handpiece tuned successfully and completed a five-minute burn-in test with the system set at 100% ultrasonic and torsional power.The handpiece was connected to dynamic tuning fixture (dtf) for stroke length testing on the longitudinal and torsional movements which found the handpiece to meet specifications.However, as the borescope test did not reveal any nonconformities, a second set of a visual and functional assessments were performed on the handpiece to confirm the prior results.A particulate test was performed in which no particles were found.The handpiece was connected to a calibrated resistance breakout test box, where the connection between the input and output impedance of the sensor was found to be within specifications.When the handpiece was connected to a calibrated breakout test box, the resistance between low electrode and high electrode was found to be out of specifications.A flow rate test was performed on the irrigation and aspiration lines of the handpiece which found the handpiece to then meet specifications per product specifications.When connected to a calibrated system, the handpiece tuned successfully and completed a five-minute burn-in test with the system set at 100% ultrasonic and torsional power.The handpiece was connected to dtf for stroke length testing on the longitudinal and torsional movements which found the handpiece to meet specifications.The nonconforming specifications related to resistance, dissipation, and flow are not related to the reported corneal edema.The customer reported event was not able to be confirmed.Based on the information obtained, the root cause of the reported events is inconclusive.Manufacturer will continue to monitor data for evidence of adverse trending and take further action, as appropriate.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).H.10 reflects all related report numbers associated with this product event that have been submitted at this time.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CENTURION VISION SYSTEM, ACCESSORY, ACTIVE SENTRY HANDPIECE
Type of Device
UNIT, PHACOFRAGMENTATION
Manufacturer (Section D)
ALCON RESEARCH, LLC - IRVINE TECHNOLOGY CENTER
15800 alton parkway
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer (Section G)
ALCON RESEARCH, LLC - IRVINE TECHNOLOGY CENTER
15800 alton parkway
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer Contact
jonathan schlech
6201 south freeway
mail stop ab2-6
fort worth, TX 76134
8007579780
MDR Report Key18550735
MDR Text Key333314457
Report Number2028159-2024-00106
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HQC
UDI-Device Identifier00380657529148
UDI-Public00380657529148
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeRP
PMA/PMN Number
K161794
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/05/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number8065752914
Device Lot Number15PJH6
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/27/2023
Initial Date FDA Received01/22/2024
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received02/07/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/05/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured05/24/2023
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
CENTURION VISION SYSTEM (ACTIVE SENTRY)
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention; Other;
-
-