• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. UNKNOWN SYNERGY HIP STEM UNCEM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. UNKNOWN SYNERGY HIP STEM UNCEM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNKNOWN
Device Problems Off-Label Use (1494); Device Markings/Labelling Problem (2911); Migration (4003)
Patient Problems Bone Fracture(s) (1870); Joint Dislocation (2374); Malunion of Bone (4529)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that, during a thr surgery, the patient suffered an intraoperative fracture at the mid plane of the femur.A synergy cementless stem was implanted along with other competitor's implants (stryker).The synergy stem was said to be compatible with these other competitor implants, but when trying to match them the surgery was complicated by the intraoperative bone fracture, apparently because of the way the s+n implant mismatch or design.The surgery was completed with the same device, but it is unknown if there was any delay.Also, when reviewing the operative report, it was noticed that the synergy stem could not be properly identified as it did not have any lot number (off label), it seems like an adulterate medical device.A revision surgery was later performed because the femur did not heal properly (malunion) after the intraoperative fracture that occurred in the primary hip surgery, and this caused the femoral and acetabular component to become subsidence, loose and dislocated.The patient current health status is unknown.Further information is unavailable.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: internal complaint reference:(b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a device analysis could not be performed.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that the information was obtained from medwatch; therefore, supporting clinical/medical records are not available.However, a procedural variance is the likely clinical root cause of the reported intraoperative fracture, as it¿s noted fracture occurred while trying to match mixed manufacturer components.As well, the mismatch components are the likely clinical root cause of the reported subsidence, looseness, dislocation and subsequent revision.The patient impact was the revision.A review made by the quality engineering team revealed that, the allegation of the part not having a laser marking can not be verified due the lack of a photo and the part not being returned.All stem are required to have a laser mark on them per print.There are multiple checks within our manufacturing process that check to ensure every stem is properly laser etched.Device specific identifiers were not provided.Therefore, an evaluation of the manufacturing records, complaint history review, risk management file, prior actions and product prints could not be performed.A review of the instructions for use documents for total hip systems revealed in warnings and precautions that the surgeon should be thoroughly familiar with the implants, instruments, and surgical procedure prior to performing surgery.Certain insertion techniques may be different than those known for conventional hip systems, and are specifically designed to avoid potential implant failures.It is important to not mix components from different manufacturers unless specially approved by the manufacturer of the components.Failure to comply may result in implant failure and revision surgery.At this time, we have no evidence to conclude that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNKNOWN SYNERGY HIP STEM UNCEM
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
1450 brooks rd.
memphis TN 38116
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
1450 brooks rd.
memphis TN 38116
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
7000 west william cannon drive
austin, TX 78735
5123913905
MDR Report Key18558014
MDR Text Key333439633
Report Number1020279-2024-00209
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LPH
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/19/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNKNOWN
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received01/22/2024
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received03/14/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/19/2024
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention; Other;
Patient Age59 YR
-
-