• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 POWERPORT ISP M.R.I. IMPLANTABLE PORT, GROSHONG SINGLE-LUMEN, 8F; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 POWERPORT ISP M.R.I. IMPLANTABLE PORT, GROSHONG SINGLE-LUMEN, 8F; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 1808560
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Bacterial Infection (1735); Unspecified Infection (1930); Fungal Infection (2419)
Event Date 05/06/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the device was not returned for evaluation.Medical records were not provided.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported adverse event as no objective evidence was provided for review.Furthermore, clinical conditions alleged in the complaint cannot be confirmed.Based on the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H10: d4 (expiration date: 05/2025).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text: device not returned.
 
Event Description
It was reported through litigation process that sometime post a port placement, the patient allegedly developed infection.However, the current status of the patient is unknown.
 
Event Description
It was reported through litigation process that eight months and twenty-seven days post a port placement, the patient allegedly experienced bacterial and fungal infection.It was further reported that the patient was started on antibiotics and antifungal medications and the port was removed.However, the current status of the patient is unknown.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the device was not returned for evaluation.Medical records were provided and reviewed.Approximately eight months and twenty-six days post port placement, patient presented to the emergency department for increased confusion and temperature 101.7 f.He had a port in place for iv infusion for every two weeks.No signs of site infection, however presumed clabsi.Computed tomographic chest was performed which showed multiple tiny pulmonary nodules of the upper lobes measuring up to 5 mm.Atelectasis and scarring of the lower lobes and lingula.Around one day later, blood culture noted positive for mycobacterium fortuitum and started on iv levaquin, imipenem and amikacin on seventh day.Around three days later, patient underwent port removal procedure.The catheter tip cultures positive for >15 colonies of candida dublinensis and oxacillin sensitive s.Hominis.Around sixteen days later, patient was started on micafungin and transitioned to fluconazole which will be concluded.Around twenty-five days later, patient was returned to rehabilitation center.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported adverse event as no objective evidence was provided for review.Furthermore, clinical conditions alleged in the complaint cannot be confirmed.Based on the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H10: d4 (expiration date: 05/2025), g2, g3, h6 (method).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
POWERPORT ISP M.R.I. IMPLANTABLE PORT, GROSHONG SINGLE-LUMEN, 8F
Type of Device
PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740
605 north 5600 west
salt lake city 84116
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD REYNOSA S.A. DE C.V. -9617592
blvd. montebello #1
parque industrial colonial
reynosa, tamaulipas 88780
MX   88780
Manufacturer Contact
brett curtice
800 w. rio salado pkwy
tempe, AZ 85281
4803032689
MDR Report Key18569380
MDR Text Key333547515
Report Number3006260740-2023-06156
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LJT
UDI-Device Identifier00801741027116
UDI-Public(01)00801741027116
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K063377
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Consumer,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/04/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number1808560
Device Lot NumberREGR4501
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/27/2023
Initial Date FDA Received01/24/2024
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received03/08/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/13/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured05/19/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age45 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-