The user facility did not involve the local draeger s&s organization into examination and repair of the device.Dräger contacted the hospital asking for further information.It was responded that the device is back in use after a repair ingress made by the biomedical department - a hose has reportedly been replaced but the contact person did not provide further details which hose the speech was about.This lack of information does not allow a case-specific evaluation and, this report is being filed in abundance of caution.Based on experience, the most likely explanation would be the following: the expiratory valve is actuated pneumatically via a small hose that is routed from the back of the device to the compact breathing system - the functional unit which contains all the valves that control the ventilation cycles.It would be imaginable that the tube may have become detached unintendedly during interaction with the device or when moving the unit.The system effect would be a drop in vacuum pressure which will end up in a safety shut-down of automatic ventilation to prevent from damages to the ventilator unit - this is the specified device response upon the tube detachment and, such an event must be attributed to use error then.Other scenarios would be imaginable as well; a differentiation is not possible since even not the aspect of ventilator failure can be confirmed or denied on the base of the available facts.If automatic ventilation fails or is shut-down for safety reasons, manual ventilation with the built-in breathing bag as well as gas dosage is still possible; pressure and flow monitoring remains functional as well.
|