• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TORAX MEDICAL, INC. 1.5T LINX, 15B; ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TORAX MEDICAL, INC. 1.5T LINX, 15B; ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number LXMC15
Device Problems Device Appears to Trigger Rejection (1524); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Patient Problems Dysphagia/ Odynophagia (1815); Pyrosis/Heartburn (1883); Hernia (2240)
Event Date 05/17/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that there was a recurrent paraoesophageal hernia.The patient suffered from reflux and dysphagia.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Date sent; 1/25/2024 attempts have been made to retrieve the device.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.No lot number was provided therefore a device history could not be done.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent: prior to linx placement, did the patient have an egd, ph, and manometry studies done? if yes, could you please share the results? what is the lot number of the linx device? when using the linx sizing device what technique was used to determine the size? did the patient have an autoimmune disease? is the patient currently taking steroids / immunosuppressive drugs? did the patient have any pre-existing dysphagia or other conditions (other than gerd)? how severe was the dysphagia/odynophagia before intervention? were there any intra-operative complications during implant? was there any hiatal or crural repair done at the same time as the implant? was the recurrent hiatal hernia repair? if so, was the device located at the ge junction or elsewhere? can you share any pre-op imaging that you can send? productcomplaint1@its.Jnj.Com were there any other contributing factors that led to the removal of the device other than the reported dysphagia, gerds and hernia? besides the reported dysphagia, gerds and hernia, what was the reason for removal of the linx device? was the device found in the correct position/geometry at the time of removal? was ph testing performed prior to explant to confirm recurrent reflux? after implant, was the device initially effective in controlling reflux? when did the recurrent reflux begin? this report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Date sent: 2/27/2024.Investigation summary: a washer was noted to be disconnected from a bead case.The washer was observed to be bent outwards and weld tracks are visible on both the washer and bead case.These findings suggest that the washer was pulled out of the bead case due to external forces applied during an explant procedure.The remaining device characteristics, excepting the issues called out above, show no anomalies for a device that has been reasonably changed as part of the explant procedure and tooling marks were noted in some beads.Link length and tensile force were found to meet the applicable specifications.Overall, no analysis conclusions relevant to the patient experience were found.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Date sent: 2/9/2024.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
1.5T LINX, 15B
Type of Device
ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
TORAX MEDICAL, INC.
4545 creek road
cincinnati OH
Manufacturer Contact
kate karberg
4545 creek rd.
cincinnati, OH 45242
3035526892
MDR Report Key18581814
MDR Text Key333746065
Report Number3008766073-2024-00018
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LEI
UDI-Device Identifier00855106005356
UDI-Public00855106005356
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P100049
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 02/27/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberLXMC15
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received01/25/2024
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received01/30/2024
02/27/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/09/2024
02/27/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age72 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight71 KG
-
-