• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH EXETER V40 STEM 44MM NO 0; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, METAL / POLYMER, NON-POROUS, CALC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH EXETER V40 STEM 44MM NO 0; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, METAL / POLYMER, NON-POROUS, CALC Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 0580-1-440
Device Problem Fracture (1260)
Patient Problem Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 01/04/2024
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
It was noted that the device is not available for evaluation.Should additional information become available, it will be provided in a supplemental report upon completion of the investigation.H3 other text : not available.
 
Event Description
Revision surgery due to broken exeter stem.Stem was revised due to breaking at the calcar/trunnion.Another company was used for the remainder of the procedure.Original surgery performed roughly 15 years ago.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Reported event: an event regarding crack/fracture involving an exeter stem was reported.The event was confirmed via provided photographs of the device and clinician review of provided medical records.Method & results: product evaluation and results: the reported device was not returned however photographs were provided for review.The photographs show that the neck of the stem has fractured.Nothing further can be observed as the device appears covered in blood.Clinician review: a review of the provided medical information by a clinical consultant indicated: "i can confirm that the patient had the primary hybrid total hip arthroplasty and sustained a prosthetic fracture of the femoral neck with a well fixed stem since i was able to review and x-ray showing the implant and fracture.Root cause analysis: the root cause of this event cannot be determined with certainty.The causes of femoral stem fracture, approximately 15 years after implantation or multifactorial including surgical technique, especially in the way the implant was cemented (in this case it was well cemented), the patient's activity level and bmi, about which we have no information, and implant factors." product history review: could not be performed as the device lot details were not provided.Complaint history review: could not be performed as the device lot details were not provided.Conclusions: it was reported that the patient was revised due to fracture of the exeter stem.The reported device was not returned however photographs were provided for review.The photographs show that the neck of the stem has fractured.Nothing further can be observed as the device appears covered in blood.The event was further confirmed by a review of the provided x-ray image by a clinical consultan: "i can confirm that the patient had the primary hybrid total hip arthroplasty and sustained a prosthetic fracture of the femoral neck with a well fixed stem since i was able to review and x-ray showing the implant and fracture.Root cause analysis: the root cause of this event cannot be determined with certainty.The causes of femoral stem fracture, approximately 15 years after implantation or multifactorial including surgical technique, especially in the way the implant was cemented (in this case it was well cemented), the patient's activity level and bmi, about which we have no information, and implant factors." further information such as return of the device and office notes/patient history are needed to investigate root cause.No further investigation for this event is possible at this time.If devices and/or additional information become available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.
 
Event Description
Revision surgery due to broken exeter stem.Stem was revised due to breaking at the calcar/trunnion.Another company was used for the remainder of the procedure.Original surgery performed roughly 15 years ago.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EXETER V40 STEM 44MM NO 0
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, METAL / POLYMER, NON-POROUS, CALC
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH
325 corporate drive
mahwah NJ 07430
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-CORK
ida industrial estate
carrigtwohill NA
EI   NA
Manufacturer Contact
arokiya raj
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key18586109
MDR Text Key333778995
Report Number0002249697-2024-00139
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MEH
UDI-Device Identifier04546540153296
UDI-Public04546540153296
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeNZ
PMA/PMN Number
K121308
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/27/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number0580-1-440
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/04/2024
Initial Date FDA Received01/26/2024
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received05/22/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/27/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
-
-