|
Model Number ONXAAP-25 |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problem
Ischemia Stroke (4418)
|
Event Date 04/20/2019 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This investigation is currently ongoing.Any additional information will be provided in the follow-up report.This report is being submitted as required by federal regulations and does not constitute an admission that the device caused or contributed to the reported event.Furthermore, this report reflects the event as alleged by the complainant and does not imply that the information reported to artivion is accurate or has been confirmed by artivion.
|
|
Event Description
|
According to the initial report, patient is subject #058 in the post-market clinical follow-up study protocol of the on-x ascending aortic prosthesis (aap) retrospective study and was implanted on 6dec2013 with a prefabricated aap device sn #(b)(6).On (b)(6) 2019 (1,961 days post implant) presented to the ed with complaints of right lower extremity weakness with onset of symptoms around 0930 the day of assessment and lasted approximately 2 hours.He presented first to a local ed where a head ct was performed with negative results and it was recommended, he be transferred to an increased level of care for an mri and lp, the patient refused and left ama.He then later presented to the referred ed and was evaluated again, he stated his symptoms had resolved he was admitted for observation and further testing.The mri showed a small ischemic injury in the left periventricular white matter , echocardiogram was unremarkable.He was diagnosed with likely small vessel stroke and discharged home on (b)(6) 2019 with neurology follow up.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Per the adjudication received, this event is not valve related.Per medical device reporting for manufacturers - fda guidance for industry and food and drug administration staff, section 2.16 an mdr report is not required when "you have information that would enable a person who is qualified to make a medical judgment to reasonably conclude that your device did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury, or that a malfunction would not be likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury, if it were to recur." therefore, further investigation is not warranted.
|
|
Event Description
|
According to the initial report, patient is subject #(b)(6) in the post-market clinical follow-up study protocol of the on-x ascending aortic prosthesis (aap) retrospective study and was implanted on (b)(6) 2013 with a prefabricated aap device sn #(b)(6).On (b)(6) 2019 (1,961 days post implant) presented to the ed with complaints of right lower extremity weakness with onset of symptoms around 0930 the day of assessment and lasted approximately 2 hours.He presented first to a local ed where a head ct was performed with negative results and it was recommended, he be transferred to an increased level of care for an mri and lp, the patient refused and left ama.He then later presented to the referred ed and was evaluated again, he stated his symptoms had resolved he was admitted for observation and further testing.The mri showed a small ischemic injury in the left periventricular white matter , echocardiogram was unremarkable.He was diagnosed with likely small vessel stroke and discharged home on (b)(6) 2019 with neurology follow up.Receipt of the adjudication form deemed the event not valve related.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|