The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no similar complaints from the lot all available information was investigated and based on information provided the reported positioning failure associated with leaflet grasping appears to be related to patient conditions (rotated heart and restricted posterior leaflet).However, based on the information provided and without the device to analyze, a cause for the inability to close the clip cannot be determined.Difficult to remove the clip delivery system (cds) from the steerable guide catheter (sgc) appears to be due to the inability to fully close the clip.Entrapment of device associated with clip becoming caught in the groin appears to be related to procedural conditions associated with inability to fully close the clip and the open clip being unable to be retracted into the sgc.Foreign body in patient associated with deploying the clip at the groin appears to be due to the procedural circumstances associated with the clip becoming caught with the anatomy (groin).Unexpected medical intervention was a result of case-specific circumstances.There is no indication of a product issue with respect to manufacture, design, or labeling.
|
It was reported that on (b)(6) 2024, a mitraclip procedure was performed to treat a mixed mitral regurgitation (mr) with grade of 4, rotated heart, and restricted posterior leaflet.First clip (xtw) was implanted a2/p2.The clip was not perfectly attached and was noted to partially move from its intended location.A second clip (xt) was then attempted to be implanted to stabilize and treat residual mr, but the physicians had difficulties grasping the leaflets.The orientation was not good and therefore was not implanted.It was decided to remove the device from the anatomy.When closing the clip arms to retract the clip into the steerable guide catheter (sgc), the arms remained open 20 to 30 degrees and was not possible to fully close the arms of the clip.It was decided by the physicians to remove the devices as a single unit, but the clip got stuck at the groin.The clip was deployed and was left in the groin.On (b)(6) 2024, an additional mitraclip procedure was performed to treat mitral regurgitation (mr) of grade 4.One clip was implanted, reducing mr to grade 1.There was no clinically significant delay in the procedure.
|