(b)(4).Date sent: 1/30/2024.Attempts have been made to retrieve the device.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Lot number was received and dhr is pending review.When the review is completed, a supplemental medwatch will be sent with a summary of the evaluation.Photo images were received.Any additional information obtained from the photo evaluation will be included as part of the product investigation.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: prior to linx placement, did the patient have an egd, ph, and manometry studies done? if yes, could you please share the results? yes, please see attached.On what date did the implant take place? (b)(6) 2021.On what date did the explant take place? (b)(6) 2024.What is the lot number of the linx device? 26414.When using the linx sizing device what technique was used to determine the size? 3 measurements.Did the patient have an autoimmune disease? no.Is the patient currently taking steroids / immunosuppressive drugs? no.Did the patient have any pre-existing dysphagia or other conditions (other than gerd)? hiatal hernia.How severe was the dysphagia/odynophagia before intervention? were there any intra-operative complications during implant? no.Was there any hiatal or crural repair done at the same time as the implant? yes, hiatal hernia repair.Were there any other contributing factors that led to the removal of the device other than the reported dysphagia? food getting stuck and vomiting.Patient had two endoscopies w/dilation and had no significant change with his symptoms.Besides the reported dysphagia, what was the reason for removal of the linx device? food getting stuck and vomiting.Was the device found in the correct position/geometry at the time of removal? yes.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
(b)(4).Investigation summary: overall review of the device function and dimensions show no anomalies from a device that has been reasonably changed as part of the explant procedure.Visual analysis was consistent with an explanted device, and link length and tensile force were found to meet the applicable specifications.Overall, no analysis conclusions relevant to the patient experience were found.
|