A.1.-a.5.There was no patient involvement.D.4.The expiration date refers to the sterile finished product.The complained inspire 6 oxygenator (catalog number 050713cn) is not distributed in the usa, therefore the udi is not applicable.The oxygenator item 050713cn is similar to the inspire 6 oxygenator 050713, which is distributed in the usa, for which the device identifier is (b)(4).G.5.The product item 050713cn is not distributed in the usa, but it is similar to the inspire 6 oxygenator 050713, which is distributed in the usa (510(k) number: k130209).H.4.The device manufacture date refers to manufacture date of the sterile, finished oxygenator.H.10.Sorin group italia manufactures the inspire 6 oxygenator.The incident occurred in beijing, china.Review of livanova complaints database revealed no other analogue cases notified for batch concerned from the market.Involved oxygenator is a stand-alone device delivered to customers without any venous and arterial lines pre-connected (installation is charged to customer).Part was not returned for testing nor visual evidence of the issue was provided.As per data currently available, and based on investigation results of a previous similar complaints database analysis, a mechanical damage to the outlet port of the oxygenator was excluded as cause of the event since it would have determined a leakage during priming phase which was successfully completed indeed.Therefore, it cannot be ruled out that a weakening of the arterial line connection assembled on the oxygenator port by customer over time during procedure may have led to the reported failure.The blood flow rate higher than priming flow rate together with loose or absent tie wraps securing this connection were also identified as potential contributing factors.H3 other text : part was not returned for testing nor visual evidence of the issue was provided.
|