• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PROCEPT BIOROBOTICS CORPORATION AQUABEAM ROBOTIC SYSTEM; FLUID JET REMOVAL SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PROCEPT BIOROBOTICS CORPORATION AQUABEAM ROBOTIC SYSTEM; FLUID JET REMOVAL SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number AB2000
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888); Low Blood Pressure/ Hypotension (1914)
Event Date 01/05/2024
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Root cause of reported event has not yet been established.Investigation by manufacturer is currently in-process.Submission of this report does not constitute an admission that the manufacturer's product caused or contributed to the event.
 
Event Description
A male patient underwent an aquablation procedure for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (bph).Procept biorobotics corporation (procept) became aware that during the first treatment pass, the patient began to move, but not significantly.The treating surgeon decided to stop the treatment and allowed anesthesia to administer additional paralytics to further relax the patient, who was already intubated under general anesthesia.The aquablation procedure was resumed after a couple of minutes without any issues.The patient was highly vascular, and significant tissue was removed during hemostasis to identify and cauterize sources of bleeding post-aquablation procedure.The treating surgeon observed bleeding from large sinuses of the prostate, particularly in the high lateral and anterior areas.Concerns grew regarding blood loss, as the patient became hypotensive, and core body temperature lowered, which was suspected to be due to the volume of room-temperature saline fluids during hemostasis.The patient required two units of blood transfusion.Given the venous nature of the bleeding and the patient's condition, the treating surgeon attempted catheter insertion and traction to tamponade the venous bleeding.However, the bleeding persisted, with the catheter displaying a very dark red.Despite applying aggressive hemostasis, the bleeding continued, presenting with a light pink effluent.The treating surgeon revisited the area with the resectoscope, yielding the same outcome.Subsequently, the treating surgeon urgently contacted radiology for an emergency prostatic artery embolization (pae) as a deemed solution to control the persistent bleeding.The patient was reported to have experienced edema due to fluid volume.The urologist was consulted, who suggested that the treating surgeon may have inadvertently entered the dorsal vein and recommended applying pressure on the prostate trans-rectally to tamponade the bleeding.Fingers were introduced for pressure application, while the aquabeam trus arm and probe were set up for tamponade.Upon trus reintroduction, it was noticed that the foley balloon catheter was not in the bladder but rather in the prostatic fossa (with 60cc).The foley balloon catheter was repositioned into the bladder, and additional water (100cc) was added to prevent slipping into the fossa.It was suspected that the catheter was either not fully placed into the bladder due to anatomical length or that the open bladder neck pulled it back into the fossa.Following proper foley balloon catheter placement, and tamponade application with the trus probe, the catheter cleared.Over the next 15-20 minutes, the bleeding stabilized, and the tamponade from the trus was removed to monitor the bleeding status.The catheter remained clear, and the decision for pae was waived.Instead, the patient was transferred to the icu with continuous bladder irrigation (cbi) traction, and lasix was administered as much as possible.The patient is reported to be doing well and has been discharged.No malfunctions of the aquabeam robotic system were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The aquabeam robotic system is a reusable device; therefore, it is still currently in possession of the user facility.The investigation of this event consisted of a review of the treatment log files, device history record (dhr), and labeling.A review of the device history record (dhr) for ab2000-b/serial number (b)(6) was performed, which confirmed that there were no non conformances, failures, discrepancies, or missed steps during the manufacturing process that could be related to the reported event.The review indicated that the device met all design and manufacturing specifications when released for distribution.The aquabeam robotic system instructions for use ifu0101-00, rev.E, was reviewed and states the following: 4.3.Warnings: procedure: as with any surgical urologic procedure, potential perioperative risks of the aquablation procedure include: bleeding.A root cause for the reported event could not be determined.It was reported that the patient was highly vascular, and significant tissue was removed during hemostasis to identify and cauterize sources of bleeding, post-aquablation procedure.The urologist who was consulted, suggested that the treating surgeon may have inadvertently entered the dorsal vein and recommended applying pressure on the prostate trans-rectally to tamponade the bleeding.Fingers were introduced for pressure application, while the aquabeam trus arm and probe were set up for tamponade.Upon trus reintroduction, it was noticed that the foley balloon catheter was not in the bladder but rather in the prostatic fossa (with 60cc).Following proper foley balloon catheter placement, and tamponade application with the trus probe, the catheter cleared.The aquabeam robotic system's ifu lists bleeding as a potential risk of the aquablation procedure.Based on the review of the treatment log files.Dhr, and ifu the event is considered not to be device-related.Submission of this report does not constitute an admission that the manufacturer's product caused or contributed to the event.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AQUABEAM ROBOTIC SYSTEM
Type of Device
FLUID JET REMOVAL SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
PROCEPT BIOROBOTICS CORPORATION
150 baytech drive
san jose CA 95134
Manufacturer (Section G)
PROCEPT BIOROBOTICS CORPORATION
150 baytech dr
san jose CA 95134
Manufacturer Contact
doria esquivel
150 baytech dr
san jose, CA 95134
6502327291
MDR Report Key18627407
MDR Text Key334367207
Report Number3012977056-2024-00018
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code PZP
UDI-Device IdentifierB614AB20001
UDI-Public+B614AB20001/16D20190308T
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
DEN170024
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/04/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberAB2000
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/06/2024
Initial Date FDA Received02/01/2024
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received02/12/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/04/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Date Device Manufactured03/08/2019
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient SexMale
-
-