B3 - date of event: date of event was approximated to 09/01/2023 as the exact event date was not reported.Device evaluated by mfr: the device was returned for evaluation.The advancer, handshake connections, sheath, coil, burr and annulus were visually and microscopically examined.Inspection found that the burr was detached, and that the coil was stretched and detached.Functional testing was performed by attempting to rotate the drive shaft, and the drive shaft was able to be rotated.The rotapro advancer was then connected to the rotapro control console system.The advancer was able to reach optimum speed without stalling.During functional testing there was no abnormalities to the device, and it ran with no speed or noise issues.The advancer was able to reach optimum speed without abnormal noises during analysis.As the burr and coil were found to be damaged, it was considered likely that the abnormal noises heard during the procedure were attributable to the separation of the coil from the burr.No other issues were identified during the product analysis.
|
Reportable based on device analysis completed on 16jan2024.It was reported that the burr sounded abnormal.A 1.25mm rotapro was selected for use.During platform testing, it was noted that the burr did not sound right.The procedure was completed with another of the same device.No patient complications were reported.However, device analysis revealed that the burr and coil were detached.
|