It was reported that a versacross connect access solution was selected for use during a watchman procedure.A perforation, a pericardial effusion and a cardiac tamponade were reported.The procedure was cancelled.While using versacross connect, the physician engaged the septum and visualized on both fluoro and transesophageal echocardiogram (tee) (bicaval biplane angle).Once tenting was confirmed, the radio frequency was given and it was crossed to the left side of the heart.The versacross rf wire was seen in the laa (left atrium appendage), so the physician clocked the versacross rf wire to try and sit in a pulmonary vein.The physician thought he was in the right pulmonary vein and started pushing the dilator and sheath across.At certain point, it was not possible to visualize where the dilator/sheath or versacross rf wire was on echo (due to the patient's anatomy, and to tee imaging issues and communication issues between the implanter and echocardiographer).After a couple minutes of trying to find out where the system was, the echocardiographer checked for effusion and the baseline pericardial effusion was getting bigger.Soon after, the patient's blood pressure dropped, and it was opened a pericardiocentesis tray.After roughly 120 cc's of blood were tapped from the pericardium, the physician pulled the sheath into the right atrium, leaving the versacross rf wire in a safe spot in the la (left atrium).The effusion became worse, and it was needed to tap again.A ct surgeon was called, an a-line was acquired and the patient was receiving blood.The patient went into to tamponade and low ef.One of the nurses started compressions and once the patients heart was able to contract on its own, they took the patient to the operation room but did not need to open the patients chest.The perforation (posterior to the fossa) closed on its own and the pericardial fluid was drained.The patient was extubated that night and stayed over and was discharged after two days.The device is not expected to be returned for analysis (contaminated).The patient had a small fossa with a narrow window to work with.The la was also small and the posterior wall anatomically lays adjacent to the posterior aspect of the fossa.The patient had a baseline trivial effusion around his ventricles prior to the procedure, but the appearance of the effusion during the procedure was significantly greater.The patient was given heparin before the effusion and then reversed heparin when they began pericardial tap.The patient was not under antiplatelet drugs at this time.The versacross rf wire was advanced and pulled back a few times after crossing into the la to try to access one of the pulmonary veins.In the physician's opinion, the perforation occurred at or just after transeptal puncture, but neither the wire nor dilator have contributed to the ae.No device issues were noted.
|