It was reported that a versacross connect access solution was selected for use during a watchman procedure.A perforation and a pericardial effusion were noted.The procedure was cancelled.The physician noted that there was a small posterior localized pericardial effusion observed via intra-cardiac echocardiography (ice) prior to procedure.There wasn't any difficulty in crossing the septum.The watchman was advanced into the left atrium appendage after transeptal puncture.During the contrast injection of appendage, the physician noted a perforation of the left atrial appendage with a circumferential pericardial effusion.The versacross rf wire was still in the left atrium when the performation was noticed.Then, the physician decided to abort the procedure.Pericardiocentesis was performed to treat the effusion.There were no further patient complications reported.The patient recovered and it was discharged.The device is not expected to be returned for analysis.It was reported that it is possible that the perforation had happened along with watchman double curve sheath and versacross connect dilator.Possibly happened after removal of dilator and positioning of sheath into appendage, and it was not possible to exclude the contribution from versacross rf wire.The physician's feels like the perforation could have been caused by the sheath when trying to cannulate the appendage for the contrast injection.Ice imaging was not very good and did not quite show the distal appendage.It is possible the sheath was further in the appendage than we thought.No issues with the versacross devices were reported.During transseptal, the septum was clearly visible and there was a normal amount of tenting when rf was applied.
|