• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 POWERPORT CLEARVUE ISP IMPLANTABLE PORT, CHRONOFLEX SINGLE-LUMEN, 8F; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 POWERPORT CLEARVUE ISP IMPLANTABLE PORT, CHRONOFLEX SINGLE-LUMEN, 8F; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 1608062
Device Problems Fluid/Blood Leak (1250); Material Puncture/Hole (1504); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Extravasation (1842); Unspecified Infection (1930)
Event Date 02/07/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not requested as the lot number reported is unknown.Investigation summary: the device was not returned for evaluation.Medical records were not provided.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported adverse event as no objective evidence was provided for review.Furthermore, the clinical conditions alleged in the complaint cannot be confirmed.Based on the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event Description
It was reported through litigation process that sometime post a port placement, the patient allegedly developed with infection.However, the current status of the patient is unknown.
 
Event Description
It was reported through the litigation process that ten months and fourteen days post a port placement via the right internal jugular vein, it was alleged that two small sites along the supraclavicular portion of the catheter appeared to have micro perforations and it was evidenced by contrast extravasation at these sites.It was further reported that the patient allegedly developed with infection.Reportedly, the infected port was removed.The current status of the patient is unknown.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The device has not been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H10: d4 (expiry date: 03/2022), g2, g3.H6 (patient).H11: b3, b5, d4 (medical device lot number), h6 (device, result, conclusion).H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : device not returned.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this product and lot.Investigation summary: the device was not returned for evaluation.Medical records were provided and reviewed.The medical record alleges that the bard implantable port was placed at the atriocaval junction to the right internal jugular vein.The port was flushed with heparin saline solution and the patient tolerated the procedure well.Approximately ten months and fourteen days later, on the right-side of chest under sterile condition, the scout image demonstrates a normal expected course of the port catheter without evidence of kinking or gross dislodgement.The contrast was slowly injected, two small sites along the supraclavicular of the catheter appeared to have micro perforation as evidenced by the contrast extravasation at this site.The catheter was flushed with saline and locked with a heparin.Approximately fifteen days later, under the fluoroscopic guidance, the right sided chest port was removed.On the same day to the left internal jugular vein, another bard implantable port was placed at the atriocaval junction.The port was then flushed with heparinized saline solution and the patient tolerated the procedural well.There was no immediate complication.After a month later, the patient was admitted to hospital for secondary pain, redness, and discharge around the port side.Oncologist found the drainage of pus.The blood culture of the test confirms that the patient allegedly developed with methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus bacterial infection as a result of defective infected port.Two days later, the infected port was removed, and the patient was treated with the intravenous cefepime, vancomycin and daptomycin.The submitted medical record confirms the evidence of catheter hole, and leakage, and the investigation confirms the reported device allegations.Additionally, it can be confirmed that the patient experienced infection.However, the relationship to the port is unknown.Furthermore, the clinical condition alleged in the complaint cannot be confirmed.Based on the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H10: (expiration date: 03/2022).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text: device not returned.
 
Event Description
It was reported through the litigation process that ten months and fourteen days post a port placement via the right internal jugular vein, it was alleged that two small sites along the supraclavicular portion of the catheter appeared to have micro perforations and it was evidenced by contrast extravasation at these sites.It was further reported that the patient allegedly developed with an infection.Reportedly, the infected port was removed.The current status of the patient is unknown.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
POWERPORT CLEARVUE ISP IMPLANTABLE PORT, CHRONOFLEX SINGLE-LUMEN, 8F
Type of Device
PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740
605 north 5600 west
salt lake city 84116
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD REYNOSA S.A. DE C.V. -9617592
blvd. montebello #1
parque industrial colonial
reynosa, tamaulipas 88780
MX   88780
Manufacturer Contact
brett curtice
800 w. rio salado pkwy
tempe, AZ 85281
4803032689
MDR Report Key18675176
MDR Text Key335004610
Report Number3006260740-2024-00428
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LJT
UDI-Device Identifier00801741026430
UDI-Public(01)00801741026430
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K063377
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Consumer,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 05/07/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number1608062
Device Lot NumberREEX0612
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/22/2024
Initial Date FDA Received02/09/2024
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received03/18/2024
05/07/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/13/2024
05/08/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age67 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight120 KG
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
Patient RaceWhite
-
-