• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY INC UNKNOWN TAR IMPLANT; PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY INC UNKNOWN TAR IMPLANT; PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNK_WWA
Device Problems Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Osseointegration Problem (3003); Migration (4003)
Patient Problems Cyst(s) (1800); Bone Fracture(s) (1870); Inadequate Osseointegration (2646); Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 01/01/2024
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Based on the available information the device remains implanted therefore an evaluation of the device cannot be performed.A review of the device history is not possible because the lot number was not communicated.Should additional information become available, it will be provided on a supplemental report.H3 other text : device remains implanted in patient.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient may need to undergo a total ankle replacement revision surgery for reasons that are not available at this time.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Corrections h6: device code, result code, conclusion code the reported event could be confirmed since images of ct scans were provided and shows loosening and migration of the tibial component.Upon further investigation of the ct scans by healthcare professionals the following was observed: ¿there is clear radiolucence and there are some cysts around the tibial component.Therefore, loosening can be confirmed.There seems to be a periprosthetic little fracture as well and that led to some subsidence of the implant.Therefore, migration can be confirmed as well.¿ based on investigation, the root cause was attributed to a patient related issue.The failure was most likely caused by a periprosthetic fracture which led to subsidence of the implant.A review of the device history was not possible because the lot number was not communicated.No corrective actions are required at this time.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.Indications of material, manufacturing, or design related problems were unable to be identified as the catalog number and lot number were not communicated.If the device is returned or if any additional information is provided, the investigation will be reassessed.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient may need to undergo a total ankle replacement revision surgery for reasons that are not available at this time.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNKNOWN TAR IMPLANT
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER
Manufacturer (Section D)
WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY INC
1023 cherry rd
memphis TN 38117
Manufacturer (Section G)
WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.
11576 memphis arlington rd
arlington TN 38002
Manufacturer Contact
anna jusinski
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key18681821
MDR Text Key335072939
Report Number3010667733-2024-00052
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HSN
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCA
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/22/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Catalogue NumberUNK_WWA
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/18/2024
Initial Date FDA Received02/09/2024
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received02/23/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/22/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-