Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.H10 additional narrative: b3: date of event is an unknown date in 2023.E3: reporter is a synthes employee.H3, h6: part: 399.990 lot: t921405 manufacturing site: tuttlingen release to warehouse date: 07 april 2008 a review of the device history records was performed for the finished device lot number, and no non-conformances were identified.Review of raw material certificate could not be established during this review due to the age of the device (over 15 years old).The product was returned to depuy synthes for evaluation.The depuy synthes team conducted a visual inspection of the returned device.Visual analysis of the returned sample revealed that the reduc-forceps toothed ratch-lock l140 were found broken from one of the two tips.The broken fragment was not returned for examination.A dimensional inspection was not completed as the it would not be relevant to the reported issue of a broken condition.A functional test was not performed as it is not applicable to the complaint condition.As part of depuy synthes quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.The observed condition of the device was consistent with a random component failure that may have been caused by exposure to unintended forces.The overall complaint was confirmed as the observed condition of the reduc-forceps toothed ratch-lock l140 would contribute to the complained device issue.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the complaint condition and hence the root cause cannot be determined.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Drawing/specifications reviewed the source controlled drawings reflecting the current revision was reviewed.Manufactured revision review cannot be perform due to the age of more than 10 years.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
Device report from new zealand reports an event as follows: it was reported that on an unknown date, some reduction forceps were damaged after a few uses of regular surgical use.The other pair in the set is fine.Customer does not believe the device had been used out of the ordinary.Instrument condition was identified by cssd staff.Upon manufacturer investigation, it was determined that the reduc-forceps toothed ratch-lock l140 were found broken from one of the two tips.This report is for a reduction forceps with serrated jaw-ratchet 144mm.This is report 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
|