• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM JET7 REPERFUSION CATHETER; NRY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM JET7 REPERFUSION CATHETER; NRY Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 5MAXJET7KIT
Device Problem Fracture (1260)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 01/12/2024
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
This device is available for return.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.H3 other text : placeholder.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a thrombectomy procedure in the right m1 segment of the middle cerebral artery (mca) using a penumbra system jet7 reperfusion catheter (jet7), a neuron max 6f 088 long sheath (neuron max), a penumbra system red 68 reperfusion catheter (red68), a stent retriever, and a guidewire.It was noted that the patient had elongated and calcified vessels.During the procedure, the physician attempted to advance the red68 with the stent retriever using the neuron max to the target location.However, due to the difficulty and unsuccessful placement of the red68, the physician decided to switch the red68 for a jet7.The physician successfully advanced the jet7 using the neuron max to the target location on the second attempt.The physician then initiated aspiration for approximately three to four minutes.The jet7 was then retracted under aspiration.Upon removal, the physician noticed that the distal length of the jet7 was fractured.The physician then used the guidewire and the neuron max to remove the fractured jet7.The physician decided to end the procedure at this point.It was reported that the patient expired on 14jan2024 due to a media infarction.The physician reported the damage to the jet7 was not related to the media infarction or the patient''s death.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation of the returned jet7 confirmed a fracture on the distal shaft.Further evaluation revealed stretching proximal to the fracture and an ovalization distal to the fracture.If the device is retracted against resistance, damage such as stretching, and a fracture may occur.The root cause of resistance during the procedure could not be determined.Further evaluation revealed additional kinks along the device.This damage was incidental to the complaint and may have occurred during removal of the device from the procedure or during packaging for return to penumbra.Penumbra catheters are inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PENUMBRA SYSTEM JET7 REPERFUSION CATHETER
Type of Device
NRY
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key18696653
MDR Text Key335262020
Report Number3005168196-2024-00050
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NRY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
K173761
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Followup
Report Date 01/01/2005,03/31/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/04/2024
Device Catalogue Number5MAXJET7KIT
Device Lot NumberC00006667
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received02/13/2024
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received03/01/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/31/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/05/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age71 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-