• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC NAVIGATION, INC (LITTLETON) O-ARM 1000 IMAGING SYSTEM; IMAGE-INTENSIFIED FLUOROSCOPIC X-RAY SYSTEM, M

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC NAVIGATION, INC (LITTLETON) O-ARM 1000 IMAGING SYSTEM; IMAGE-INTENSIFIED FLUOROSCOPIC X-RAY SYSTEM, M Back to Search Results
Model Number BI70000027100
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Bone Fracture(s) (1870); Necrosis (1971)
Event Date 06/18/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
A1-a5) patient information was unavailable from the site.B3) event date is the online accepted date of the literature article.D4) device lot number, or serial number, unavailable.G4) 510(k) is dependent upon the device model number and therefore, unavailable.H3,h6) no parts have been received by the manufacturer for evaluation.H4) device manufacturing date is dependent on lot number/serial number, therefore, unavailable.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Fujiwara, t., kunisada, t., takeda, k., hasei, j., nakata, e., nakahara, r., yoshida, a., ozaki, t.Intraoperative o-arm-navigated resection in musculoskeletal tumors.Journal of orthopaedic science.2018.23 (1045e1050) https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.Jos.2018.06.012 background: although emerging evidence has suggested that computer-assisted navigation allows sur-geons to plan the optimal level of resection without compromising the surgical margins, the precise accuracy of the procedures has been unclear.The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy and safety of the musculoskeletal tumor resection using o-arm/stealth intraoperative navigation assistance.Methods: a retrospective study of six patients with bone and soft tissue tumors who underwent surgical resection using o-arm/stealth navigation system was performed.The histological diagnosis was osteo-sarcoma, metastatic bone tumor, leiomyosarcoma, undifferentiated sarcoma, and synovial sarcoma, respectively.Tumor resection was performed according to planned osteotomy planes determined on o-arm/stealth three-dimensional intraoperative images.The resection accuracy, length of time for the procedures, surgical margins, and perioperative complications were evaluated.Results: the distances between the entry and exit points for the planned and actual cuts were 1.5 ± 0.3 mm and 2.3 ± 0.3 mm, respectively, and the mean discrepancy of the osteotomy angle was 2.8 ± 1.2.The mean length of time required for navigation was 14 min.A histological examination revealed clear margins in all patients.There were no complications related to navigation, and no patients developed local recurrence during a mean follow-up of 30.6 months.Conclusions: the o-arm/stealth intraoperative ct navigation system provides safe and accurate osteot-omy in musculoskeletal tumor re sections.However, surgeons should keep in mind and be careful of minimal errors during osteotomy, which are around 2 mm from the planned line.Reported events: there were two peri-operative complications in patient 5: an intraoperative fracture and wound necrosis occurred, which were not cau sed by the navigation-related techniques.See attached literature article.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H2) additional information was received and the system that was used was the o-arm basic system serial number: (b)(6).Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
O-ARM 1000 IMAGING SYSTEM
Type of Device
IMAGE-INTENSIFIED FLUOROSCOPIC X-RAY SYSTEM, M
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC NAVIGATION, INC (LITTLETON)
300 foster st
littleton MA 01460
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC NAVIGATION, INC (LITTLETON)
300 foster st
littleton MA 01460
Manufacturer Contact
glen belmer
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
6122713209
MDR Report Key18699064
MDR Text Key335294342
Report Number3004785967-2024-00104
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OXO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K050996
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/12/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/26/2017
Device Model NumberBI70000027100
Device Catalogue NumberBI70000027100
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received02/13/2024
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received02/16/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/12/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Date Device Manufactured12/12/2012
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-