|
Model Number 83779 |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Difficult to Remove (1528); Failure to Advance (2524); Material Deformation (2976)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 01/11/2024 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
E1 - initial reporter facility name: (b)(6).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the interlocking arm was detached.The target lesion was located in the internal iliac artery.A 10mm x 30cm interlock was selected for use.During the procedure, stc18 microcatheter together with a non boston scientific single curve catheter was used to deliver the coil, however it was felt abnormally unsmooth, and the coil could no longer be advanced after delivered half into the patient's body.It was noted that the delivery guidewire was severely bent, and during recapturing, it was noted that it could not be withdrawn into the protector.It had to be completed removed and the interlocking arm detached.The procedure was then completed with another of same device.No complications were reported, and the patient was stable post procedure.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
E1 - initial reporter facility name: (b)(6).Device evaluated by mfr: the introducer sheath and the pusher wire were returned with a non-boston scientific (bsci) catheter.It was observed that the pusher wire was bent at the coil, heat shrink tetrafluoroethylene (tfe) tubing and end pusher wire.The functional could not be performed due the main coil and the pusher wire are not interlocking.No other issues were identified during the product analysis.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the interlocking arm was detached.The target lesion was located in the internal iliac artery.A 10mm x 30cm interlock was selected for use.During the procedure, stc18 microcatheter together with a non boston scientific single curve catheter was used to deliver the coil, however it was felt abnormally unsmooth, and the coil could no longer be advanced after delivered half into the patient's body.It was noted that the delivery guidewire was severely bent, and during recapturing, it was noted that it could not be withdrawn into the protector.It had to be completed removed and the interlocking arm detached.The procedure was then completed with another of same device.No complications were reported, and the patient was stable post procedure.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|