• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK INC BEACON TIP TORCON NB ADVANTAGE ANGIOGRAPHIC CATHETER; DQO CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK INC BEACON TIP TORCON NB ADVANTAGE ANGIOGRAPHIC CATHETER; DQO CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC Back to Search Results
Catalog Number HNBR5.0-35-90-P-NS-RBT
Device Problems Break (1069); Difficult to Remove (1528); Stretched (1601)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 02/02/2024
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown or unavailable.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Event Description
As reported, during a procedure involving embolization of the pelvic artery, a beacon tip torcon nb advantage angiographic catheter became stuck in the patient.Toward the end of the case, the physician attempted to use an unknown microcatheter and wire and upon advancing the micro system, the devices became stuck.The physician torqued the complaint device in an attempt to unstick it.Access was obtained in the opposite side and a snare was used to snare the tip of the catheter to release it, prolonging the case.There was no harm to the patient.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unavailable, or unchanged.Additional information: b5 this report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received 20feb2024.The anatomy was very tortuous.The beacon tip catheter had been used a lot throughout the case with ease; however, it became difficult to advance and remove the catheter toward the end of the case.
 
Event Description
Upon return and evaluation of the device on 15apr2024, the catheter was stretched and separated.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unchanged, or unavailable.Summary of event: as reported, during a procedure involving embolization of the pelvic artery, a beacon tip torcon nb advantage angiographic catheter became stuck in the patient.Toward the end of the case, the physician attempted to use an unknown microcatheter and wire and upon advancing the micro system, the devices became stuck.The physician torqued the complaint device in an attempt to unstick it.Access was obtained in the opposite side and a snare was used to snare the tip of the catheter to release it, prolonging the case.There was no harm to the patient.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.Additional information was received 20feb2024.The anatomy was very tortuous.The beacon tip catheter had been used a lot throughout the case with ease; however, it became difficult to advance and remove the catheter toward the end of the case.Investigation evaluation: reviews of the complaint history, device history record (dhr), instructions for use (ifu), and quality control procedures were conducted during the investigation.A visual inspection of the complaint device was also conducted.The complaint device was returned to cook for investigation.The catheter was received in two segments.The proximal segment measured 52-centimeters and the distal segment measured 44.1-centimeters.The black tip was stretched and elongated, measuring approximately 4.5-centimeters.A document-based investigation evaluation was performed.A review of the device history record found no relevant non-conformances on the lot.A review of complaint history found no additional complaints for this lot number.The product ifu states ¿if resistance is encountered during manipulation, stop and determine the cause before proceeding any further.¿ a review of the device master record (dmr) concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.The information provided upon review of the dmr, dhr, ifu, and investigation of the returned device suggests that there is evidence the device was manufactured to specification.There is no evidence of non-conforming devices in-house or in the field.Based on the information provided and the results of the investigation, cook has concluded that the patient¿s very tortuous anatomy contributed to this event.Reportedly, the catheter was used ¿a lot¿ throughout the case; however, became difficult to advance and remove toward the end of the case.The risk analysis for this failure mode was reviewed and no additional escalation was required.The appropriate personnel have been notified and cook will continue to monitor for similar events.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BEACON TIP TORCON NB ADVANTAGE ANGIOGRAPHIC CATHETER
Type of Device
DQO CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer (Section G)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer Contact
jason crouch
750 daniels way
bloomington, IN 47404
8123392235
MDR Report Key18721394
MDR Text Key335584408
Report Number1820334-2024-00223
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DQO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K173289
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 05/14/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberHNBR5.0-35-90-P-NS-RBT
Device Lot Number15757230
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/06/2024
Initial Date FDA Received02/16/2024
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received02/20/2024
04/15/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/08/2024
05/14/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/15/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-