Visual analysis was performed on the returned device.The reported event of material separation could be confirmed.However, the reported event of difficulty in advancing and removing could not be replicated in a testing environment as it was based on operational circumstances.There was a kink on the male connector area.The corewire and distal tip coil were noted to be separated.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no indication of a lot-specific product quality issues.The reported event of material separation resulting in foreign body in patient, difficulty in advancing, and difficulty in removing was likely due to the circumstances of the procedure.Based on the information, it was likely that anatomical conditions or incautious removal caused inadvertent damage such as bend/kink on the distal tip.The damage likely compromised the integrity of the distal tip which likely resulted in a separation.The guiding catheter also likely contributed to the reported issue.Information from the field stated that the pressurewire was used with a guiding catheter smaller than 6f.The pressurewire instructions for use (ifu) directs the user to use the pressurewire guidewire in conjunction with a 6f (2 mm diameter) guiding catheter.In this case, the user used a 5f catheter which likely contributed to the reported difficulties.The unexpected medical intervention appears to be related to the circumstances of the procedure.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.H6: health effect - clinical code 4582 removed, 2687 added.
|