|
Model Number 39467-175 |
Device Problem
Mechanical Problem (1384)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 01/30/2024 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
E1.Initial reporter address 1: (b)(6).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the wire was not locking.A 1.75mm rotapro was used together with a rotawire.During insertion, it was noted that the rotawire was not locking with the advancer.The rotawire could not be locked even during dynaglide mode, and the button for unlocking was not in use.The device was able to be removed while in normal mode and the procedure was completed with another of the same device.There was no patient injury reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
E1.Initial reporter address 1: (b)(6).D4.Lot number, expiration date and h4.Device manufacture date corrected.Device evaluated by manufacturer: the device was returned for analysis.The burr catheter was received attached to the advancer unit.The advancer, handshake connections, sheath, coil, burr and annulus were visually examined.Inspection of the device found no damages or defects.The rotawire used in the procedure was not returned; a test wire was used for analysis.The rotawire was inserted into the annulus of the burr and advanced the through the advancer with no resistance or issues.Functional testing was then performed by connecting the advancer to the rotapro control console.During functional testing, the brake engaged when the ablation button [knob switch] was pressed and held the wire in place in both normal and dynaglide mode with no resistance or issues.Product analysis did not confirm the reported event, as the test wire was not able to move when the ablation button was pressed.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the wire was not locking.A 1.75mm rotapro was used together with a rotawire.During insertion, it was noted that the rotawire was not locking with the advancer.The rotawire could not be locked even during dynaglide mode, and the button for unlocking was not in use.The device was able to be removed while in normal mode and the procedure was completed with another of the same device.There was no patient injury reported.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|