• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEPUY MITEK LLC US TUNNEL DILATOR 10.5MM *EA; ACCESSORIES, ARTHROSCOPIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DEPUY MITEK LLC US TUNNEL DILATOR 10.5MM *EA; ACCESSORIES, ARTHROSCOPIC Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 219412
Device Problem Device Contaminated During Manufacture or Shipping (2969)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: e3: reporter is a j&j sales representative.(b)(4) as of this date, the device has not been returned for evaluation; therefore, the reported condition cannot be confirmed and/or duplicated.
 
Event Description
It was reported from the sales rep on an unspecified date that the tunnel dilator 6.5mm *ea devices (x6) dilator had contaminants (rust and metal shavings) in the cannulated sleeve of the instrument.This event did not occur during surgery.All available information has been disclosed.This is report 5 of 6 for (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.H10 additional narrative: investigation summary: the complaint device is not being returned, it was retained by the customer, therefore unavailable for a physical evaluation.Since the complaint device was not returned, we cannot determine a root cause for the reported failure.If additional information or the device is received in the future, we will reopen the complaint and perform the investigation as appropriate.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number 20k02, and no non-conformances were identified.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.D9, h6: the actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once the device has been evaluated, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Investigation summary: the product was returned to depuy synthes mitek for evaluation.Depuy synthes mitek then conducted visual inspection of the device received.The device was returned without its original packaging.Upon visual inspection, the device has no structural anomalies or damages.Under magnification into the center canal, evidence of rust was found on the proximal end.The overall complaint was confirmed as the observed condition of the tunnel dilator 10.5mm *ea would have contributed to the complained issue.The manufacturer performed a previous investigation related to same issue, with the following result: before the packaging process a hutter (brush) is used to clean the hole of each device, then perform an ultra sonic bath cleaning to these products.Tag performs a 100% visual inspection for defects including rust during product release, it also consists in detect mechanical defects, visible scratches, and burrs.The external factors that could have caused the reported issue as per the instructions for use; stating that the products must be stored in a manner to protect from dust, moisture, insects, vermin and extreme of temperature and humidity.These products should be subjected to room temperature.To the information provided and as to our estimate, these products were not stored as to the ifu requirements, the condition of these tunnel dilators products with different lot numbers and manufactured at different times and years have the same problem of rust which can be related an improper storage.The device was manufactured in 08/20/2020 hence indicates that is more than 3 years old.Therefore, the potential root cause can be attributed to the storage conditions after the device was manufactured.Therefore it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the reported complaint condition.As part of depuy synthes mitek quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities device history review a manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number and no non-conformances were identified.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Type of Device
ACCESSORIES, ARTHROSCOPIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
DEPUY MITEK LLC US
325 paramount drive
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer (Section G)
DEPUY MITEK LLC US
325 paramount drive
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer Contact
kate karberg
325 paramount drive
raynham, MA 02767
3035526892
MDR Report Key18747898
MDR Text Key336401367
Report Number1221934-2024-00540
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NBH
UDI-Device Identifier10886705006373
UDI-Public10886705006373
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 02/21/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number219412
Device Lot Number20K02
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/12/2024
Initial Date FDA Received02/21/2024
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received03/04/2024
Not provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/04/2024
05/29/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Date Device Manufactured08/20/2020
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-