• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ADVANTAGE FIT BLUE SYSTEM; MESH, SURGICAL, SYNTHETIC, UROGYNECOLOGIC, FOR STRESS URINARY INCONTINENCE, RETR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ADVANTAGE FIT BLUE SYSTEM; MESH, SURGICAL, SYNTHETIC, UROGYNECOLOGIC, FOR STRESS URINARY INCONTINENCE, RETR Back to Search Results
Model Number 73189
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Erosion (1750); Pain (1994); Prolapse (2475); Dyspareunia (4505); Fecal Incontinence (4571)
Event Date 04/13/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Block b3 date of event: the exact event onset date is unknown.The provided event date of may 11, 2022, was chosen as a best estimate based on the date of mesh removal.Block e1: this event was reported by the patient's legal representation.The implanting physician is: dr.(b)(6) at (b)(6) hospital.Phone:(b)(6).The revision physician is: dr.(b)(6).Phone: (b)(6).Block h6: the following imdrf patient codes capture the reportable events of: e2006 - mesh erosion.E2330 - pain.E1405 - painful intercourse.The following imdrf impact codes capture the reportable events of: f1905 - vaginal mesh removal.
 
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific that an advantage fit system was implanted into the patient during a laparoscopic hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy, paravaginal defect repair with graft, posterior colporrhaphy with graft, enterocele repair, uterosacral ligament suspension, mid-urethral sling, and cystoscopy procedures performed on (b)(6) 2019, for the treatment of uterine prolapse, bilateral paravaginal defects, enterocele, rectocele, and stress urinary incontinence.Description of procedure: the colpotomy was then begun anteriorly.This was continued until the cervix was completely separated from the vagina.The uterus cervix, and tubes, were then pulled into the vagina, and then removed.Attention was then turned to the vaginal portion of the procedure.The enterocele was closed reefing the peritoneum from uterosacral ligament on the right to uterosacral ligament on the left.The vaginal cuff was closed horizontally.Attention was turned to the vaginal paravaginal defect pair.After injection with dilute vasopressin solution, a vertical incision was made the anterior vagina from the cuff to the bladder neck.Weakness and absence of fascia was noted.Skin incisions of five millimeters were then suprapubically, two centimeters to the and left of midline.Cystoscopy was performed; the urethra, trigone, and ureteral orifices were normal in appearance.There was no damage to the bladder.Strong jets of urine were seen from the ureteral orifices bilaterally.The mesh was trimmed below skin level.Skin incisions were closed using dermabond glue.The vagina closed using 2-0 vicryl suture in a running stitch.Weakness and absence of the rectovaginal fascia were noted throughout this repair.The graft was cut to fit the space and was attached proximally at the vaginal apex, laterally at the pelvic sidewall, distally at the perineal.Rectal exam showed excellent closure of the defect and no damage too.The vagina was closed using 2-0 vicryl suture.Second look laparoscopy was performed, and excellent hemostasis noted.The cuff was irrigated copiously.The pneumoperitoneum was reversed.The fascia closed on all ports using 0-vicryl suture.The skin closed using stitches and skin glue.She was transferred in a stable condition.On (b)(6) 2022, the patient was diagnosed with mesh erosion, rectocele, enterocele, and fecal incontinence and underwent sling revision, posterior repair, enterocele repair, and cystourethroscopy.The patient reports pain with intercourse of her and her partner, and mesh exposure was identified by her physician.The exposed mesh was trimmed in the office, but pain persisted.The patient desired definitive management with sling revision.Treatments including risks and benefits were discussed.All questions were answered.Sling revision: there was no evidence of injury to the urethra or the bladder.A midline incision was made to dissect the mesh from the left sulus; however, the mesh could be seen folded over in the midline and then extending inferolateral back to the right side.The vaginal epithelium trimmed.Normal genital hiatus was identified in terms of the width, consequently, a transverse incision was made in order to avoid narrowing the introitus.This was followed by midline vertical incision which extended several centimeters from the apex.The vaginal epithelium was dissected off the underlying vagina mucsularis bilaterally.A 2-0 vicryl was used to reduce the enterocele sac with a purse string suture.Minimal vaginal epithelium trimmed and 2-0 vicryl used to close the vaginal opening in running fashion.The transverse incision was closed with interrupted sutures in order to avoid narrowing the introitus.Repeat cystourethroscopy was performed and there as no evidence of any injury to the urethra or bladder with bilateral jets identified.The vagina was then copiously irrigated and repeat rectal exam was performed.There was no evidence of rectal injury.The patient had tolerated the procedure well and was taken to recovery.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ADVANTAGE FIT BLUE SYSTEM
Type of Device
MESH, SURGICAL, SYNTHETIC, UROGYNECOLOGIC, FOR STRESS URINARY INCONTINENCE, RETR
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
300 boston scientific way
marlborough MA 01752
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
780 brookside drive
spencer IN 47460
Manufacturer Contact
farshad fahimi
4100 hamline avenue north
building c
saint paul, MN 55112
MDR Report Key18749355
MDR Text Key335934091
Report Number2124215-2024-09852
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OTN
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K020110
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Consumer
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 02/21/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/05/2022
Device Model Number73189
Device Catalogue Number73189
Device Lot Number0023910317
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/24/2024
Initial Date FDA Received02/21/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/06/2019
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other; Required Intervention;
Patient Age52 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-