An engineering evaluation was performed to assess for any manufacturing related processes which could be correlated to the complaint.As part of this investigation a process evaluation was performed in the manufacturing line in order to verify if the reported issue could be caused during the manufacturing process.The process engineer subject matter expert (sme) was consulted and it was confirmed that as part of the manufacturing process in the step of cut to length a sharp object is used to cut the catheter to usable length.However, this operation is performed where the thermistor is placed in the catheter.As per product evaluation results, the cut of approximately 2 mm in length was found on the catheter body at 11.5 cm from the backform; which was far enough into the manufacturing process where a sharp object is used in the catheter.Based on this, there is not clear evidence that could conclude that the defect reported was caused of the manufacturing.However, a personnel awareness was performed to the manufacturing operators during this process evaluation.Based on this results, no root cause for the reported issue could be identified as part of this investigation; edwards will monitor all similar incidences and actions will be taken as applicable.As part of the manufacturing process 100 % visual inspection is conducted as well as 100 % leak test is performed.Quality assurance inspection is also performed to ensure that all samples are manufactured as per the requirements established.A device history record review was completed and documented that device met all specifications upon distribution.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as a part of the monthly review.
|