It was reported through litigation process that ten years eight months two days post a filter placement, the filter allegedly migrated.It was further reported that majority of prongs were allegedly perforating the patient's inferior vena cava.While removal, one strut allegedly fractured and broke.Reportedly, the filter and the fractured strut was removed.However, the current status of the patient is unknown.
|
H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not requested as the lot number reported is unknown.Investigation summary: the device was not returned for evaluation.Medical records were not provided.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported filter migration, strut detachment and perforation of vena cava wall, as no objective evidence was provided for review.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : device not returned.
|