• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS INCORPORATED THE CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS, INC. (CSI) DIAMONDBACK 360 CORONARY ORBITAL ATHERECT; CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS INCORPORATED THE CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS, INC. (CSI) DIAMONDBACK 360 CORONARY ORBITAL ATHERECT; CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY Back to Search Results
Patient Problems Exsanguination (1841); Cardiac Perforation (2513)
Event Date 01/15/2024
Event Type  Death  
Event Description
(csi) cardiovascular systems inc.Atherectomy device causing perforation of the coronary artery and subsequently death the cardiovascular systems, inc.(csi) diamondback 360 coronary orbital atherectomy system (oas).I have been the cath lab director at (b)(6) hospital in (b)(6) twice.I am a busy interventional cardiologist.I have been board-certified in cardiology for 20 years.This case i am reporting happened with my partner where the csi atherectomy catheter was used appropriately by my partner with the support of the company representative.The device created a massive perforation of the right coronary artery that was unsalvagable resulting in patient death.Over the last 2 years, i have seen in several hospitals i go to, 3 deaths related to the same device by 3 other operators.The standard of care has been rotational atherectomy for decades which is safer than this pretty aggressive device.Every conference i go to and every interventionalist i have met over the years in major academic hospitals show or mention a case of massive perforation.Even in the board exam, it was hinted at that.I believe this is a potentially dangerous device despite the company trying to talk down the serious orbital damage to the blood vessel.There are safer options nowadays with shockwave lithotripsy or even rotational atherectomy.If there is no way to withdraw this device from being used in the coronary arteries in the market - i suggest making it very difficult to use it except in operators who do 20 or more rotational atherectomies a year yes, the 3-4 operators who had some deaths with this device use it only very few times a year and the industry company representatives tend to push more doctors to do it and claim it to be a safer device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
THE CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS, INC. (CSI) DIAMONDBACK 360 CORONARY ORBITAL ATHERECT
Type of Device
CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY
Manufacturer (Section D)
CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
MDR Report Key18757858
MDR Text Key335996782
Report NumberMW5151792
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MCX
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Voluntary
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 02/17/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received02/21/2024
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Death;
Patient Age71 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight56 KG
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
Patient RaceWhite
-
-