RESPIRONICS, INC. BIPAP A40; VENTILATOR, CONTINUOUS, MINIMAL VENTILATORY SUPPORT, FACILITY USE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number R1076495 |
Device Problem
Unexpected Shutdown (4019)
|
Patient Problems
Low Oxygen Saturation (2477); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 08/27/2016 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
The manufacturer received information alleging a ventilator inoperative condition occurred.The device was replaced.There was no harm or injury reported.The ventilator was returned to the manufacturer for evaluation and the customer¿s complaint was duplicated.The device's valve was replaced to address the issue.The replaced part was received at the philips investigation lab (pil) but the reported issue was not duplicated during testing.The valve assembly was installed and operated on a testing device for an extended period of time with no indication of a failure.The valve assembly did show evidence of contaminants which may have contributed to the reported event.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The manufacturer previously reported information alleging a ventilator inoperative condition occurred.The device was replaced.There was no harm or injury reported.The ventilator was returned to the manufacturer for evaluation and the customer¿s complaint was duplicated.The device's valve was replaced to address the issue.The replaced part was received at the philips investigation lab (pil) but the reported issue was not duplicated during testing.The valve assembly was installed and operated on a testing device for an extended period of time with no indication of a failure.The valve assembly did show evidence of contaminants which may have contributed to the reported event.Corrections have been made as follows: section b.Adverse event/product problem changed to "both", outcomes attributed to ae changed to "other", and section h.Type of reported complaint changed to "serious injury." coding has been updated accordingly.After further review, this report will now be filed as an adverse event.The manufacturer received information that the patient desaturated and an alarm was activated.The device was turned on by a nurse, but the alarm occurred again.The patient was disconnected from the device and the device was replaced.There was no report of the patient suffering any health hazard.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|