• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK INC ZENITH FLEX AAA ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT BIFURCATED MAIN BODY; MIH SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK INC ZENITH FLEX AAA ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT BIFURCATED MAIN BODY; MIH SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT Back to Search Results
Model Number N/A
Device Problems Fracture (1260); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Event Date 02/15/2024
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown or unavailable.E1 - customer (person): postal code: (b)(6), phone: (b)(6) this report includes information known at this time.A follow up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a fracture of the second covered stent in the body of the zenith flex aaa endovascular graft bifurcated main body graft was discovered in a male patient.On (b)(6) 2017, the following grafts were implanted in the body of the patient in an endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (evar) procedure: zenith flex aaa endovascular graft bifurcated main body (rpn: tffb-32-82-zt) zenith flex with spiral-z technology aaa endovascular graft iliac leg (rpn: zsle 24-90-zt) zenith flex with spiral-z technology aaa endovascular graft iliac leg (rpn: zsle-24-74-zt) on a routine post-procedure follow up, an x-ray revealed a fracture of the second covered stent in the main body graft.The fracture was best seen on the lateral view but could also been seen on the left of the graft on the frontal view.The physician noted that a fracture of one of the posterior barbs on the lateral view was suspected.The patient was reported to be asymptomatic, with a type ii endoleak.At this time, no additional procedures have been planned.The patient is being seen by the physician on (b)(6) 2024 to determine if additional intervention is required.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unavailable, or unchanged.Investigation ¿ evaluation it was reported that a fracture of the second covered stent in the body of the zenith flex aaa endovascular graft bifurcated main body graft was discovered in a patient.On 25apr2017, the zenith flex aaa endovascular graft bifurcated main body and left and right zenith flex with spiral-z technology aaa endovascular graft iliac leg grafts were implanted in the body of the patient in an endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (evar) procedure.On a routine post-procedure follow up, an x-ray revealed a fracture of the second covered stent in the main body graft.The fracture was best seen on the lateral view but could also been seen on the left of the graft on the frontal view.The physician noted that a fracture of one of the posterior barbs on the lateral view was suspected.The patient was reported to be asymptomatic, with a type ii endoleak.At this time, no additional procedures have been planned.The patient is being seen by the physician on 21feb2024 to determine if additional intervention is required.Reviews of documentation including the complaint history, drawing, device history record (dhr), quality control procedures, specifications, manufacturing instructions (mi), and instructions for use (ifu) of the complaint device were conducted during the investigation.The complaint device was not returned for investigation; therefore, no physical examination could be conducted.However, medical imaging was provided by the customer for expert review.The second main body covered stent fracture was confirmed.Suprarenal stent barb separation was confirmed.The sealing stent was nearly unsupported.The barb separation and the stent apex fracture was indicative of increased stress in the absence of seal zone support.Additionally, a document-based investigation evaluation was performed.A review of the device master record (dmr) concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.A review of the dhrs for the reported complaint device lot and the related subassembly lots revealed no relevant non-conformances.A database search did not identify any other complaints associated with the reported device lot.Cook also reviewed product labeling.The ifu t_zaaaf_rev4 packaged with the device contains the following in relation to the reported failure mode: "4 warnings and precautions 4.1 general ¿ additional endovascular interventions or conversion to standard open surgical repair following initial endovascular repair should be considered for patients experiencing an enlarging aneurysm, unacceptable decrease in fixation length (vessel and component overlap) and/or endoleak.An increase in aneurysm size and/or persistent endoleak or migration may lead to aneurysm rupture.¿ patients experiencing reduced blood flow through the graft limb and/or leaks may be required to undergo secondary interventions or surgical procedures.4.2 patient selection, treatment and follow-up ¿ the zenith flex aaa endovascular graft is designed to treat aortic neck diameters no smaller than 18 mm and no larger than 32 mm.The zenith flex aaa endovascular graft is designed to treat proximal aortic necks (distal to the lowest renal artery) of at least 15 mm in length.Iliac artery distal fixation site greater than 10 mm in length and 7.5-20 mm in diameter (measured outer wall to outer wall) is required.These sizing measurements are critical to the performance of the endovascular repair.¿ key anatomical elements that may affect successful exclusion of the aneurysm include severe proximal neck angulation (>60 degrees for infrarenal neck to axis of aaa or >45 degrees for suprarenal neck relative to the immediate infrarenal neck); short proximal aortic neck (<15 mm); an inverted funnel shape (greater than 10% increase in diameter over 15 mm of proximal aortic neck length); and circumferential thrombus and/or calcification at the arterial implantation sites, specifically the proximal aortic neck and distal iliac artery interface.In the presence of anatomical limitations, a longer neck may be required to obtain adequate sealing and fixation.Irregular calcification and/or plaque may compromise the attachment and sealing at the fixation sites.Necks exhibiting these key anatomical elements may be more conductive to graft migration or endoleak.¿ successful patient selection requires specific imaging and accurate measurements; please see section 4.3 pre-procedure measurement techniques and imaging.4.3 pre-procedure measurement techniques and imaging ¿ clinical experience indicates that contrast-enhanced spiral computed tomographic angiography (cta) with 3-d reconstruction is the strongly recommended imaging modality to accurately assess patient anatomy prior to treatment with the zenith flex aaa endovascular graft.If contrast-enhanced spiral cta with 3- d reconstruction is not available, the patient should be referred to a facility with these capabilities.Lengths ¿ the long-term performance of endovascular grafts has not yet been established.All patients should be advised that endovascular treatment requires life-long, regular follow-up to assess their health and the performance of their endovascular graft.Patients with specific clinical findings (e.G., endoleaks, enlarging aneurysm or changes in the structure or position of the endovascular graft) should receive enhanced follow-up.Specific follow-up guidelines are described in section 12, imaging guidelines and postoperative follow-up.¿ after endovascular graft placement, patients should be regularly monitored for perigraft flow, aneurysm growth or changes in the structure or position of the endovascular graft.At a minimum, annual imaging is required, including: 1) abdominal radiographs to examine device integrity (separation between components, stent fracture or barb separation) and 2) contrast and non-contrast ct to examine aneurysm changes, perigraft flow, patency, tortuosity, and progressive disease.If renal complications or other factors preclude the use of image contrast media, abdominal radiographs and duplex ultrasound may provide similar information.4.4 device selection ¿ strict adherence to the zenith flex aaa endovascular graft ifu sizing guide is strongly recommended when selecting the appropriate device size (tables 10.5.1 through 10.5.2).Appropriate device oversizing has been incorporated into the ifu sizing guide.Sizing outside of this range can result in endoleak, fracture, migration, device infolding or compression.4.5 implant procedure ¿ do not bend or kink the delivery system.Doing so may cause damage to the delivery system and the zenith flex aaa endovascular graft.¿ do not continue advancing any portion of the delivery system if resistance is felt during advancement of the wire guide or delivery system.Stop and assess the cause of resistance; vessel, catheter or graft damage may occur.Exercise particular care in areas of stenosis, intravascular thrombosis or in calcified or tortuous vessels.¿ fluoroscopy should be used during introduction and deployment to confirm proper operation of the delivery system components, proper placement of the graft, and desired procedural outcome.¿ the zenith flex aaa endovascular graft incorporates a suprarenal stent with fixation barbs.Exercise extreme caution when manipulating interventional and angiographic devices in the region of the suprarenal stent.¿ before deployment of the suprarenal stent, verify that the position of the access wire guide extends just distal to the aortic arch.5.2 potential adverse events ¿ aneurysm enlargement ¿ aneurysm rupture and death ¿ claudication (e.G., buttock, lower limb) ¿ endoleak ¿ endoprosthesis: improper component placement; incomplete component deployment; component migration; suture break; occlusion; infection; stent fracture; material wear; dilatation; erosion; puncture; perigraft flow; barb separation and corrosion ¿ surgical conversion to open repair 7.1 individualization of treatment additional considerations for patient selection include but are not limited to: ¿ patient¿s age and life expectancy ¿ co-morbidities (e.G., cardiac, pulmonary, or renal insufficiency prior to surgery, morbid obesity) ¿ patient¿s suitability for open surgical repair ¿ patient¿s anatomical suitability for endovascular repair ¿ ability to tolerate general, regional, or local anesthesia.¿ iliofemoral access vessel size and morphology (minimal thrombus, calcium and/or tortuosity) should be compatible with vascular access techniques and accessories of the delivery profile of a 16 french to 22 french vascular introducer sheath.¿ iliac artery distal fixation site greater than 10 mm in length and 7.5 to 20 mm in diameter (measured outer wall to outer wall).8 patient counseling information ¿ the long-term performance of endovascular grafts has not yet been established.All patients should be advised that endovascular treatment requires lifelong, regular follow-up to assess their health and the performance of their endovascular graft.Patients with specific clinical findings (e.G, endoleaks, enlarging aneurysms or changes in the structure or position of the endovascular graft) should receive enhanced follow-up.Specific follow-up guidelines are described in section 12, imaging guidelines and postoperative follow-up.¿ patients should be counseled on the importance of adhering to the follow-up schedule, both during the first year and at yearly intervals thereafter.Patients should be told that regular and consistent follow-up is a critical part of ensuring the ongoing safety and effectiveness of endovascular treatment of aaas.At a minimum, annual imaging and adherence to routine postoperative follow-up requirements are required and should be considered a lifelong commitment to the patient¿s health and well-being.¿ physicians must advise each patient that it is important to seek prompt medical attention if they experience signs of limb occlusion, aneurysm enlargement or rupture.Signs of graft limb occlusion include pain in the hip(s) or leg(s) during walking or at rest or discoloration or coolness of the leg.Aneurysm rupture may be asymptomatic, but usually presents as: pain; numbness; weakness in the legs; any back, chest, abdominal or groin pain; dizziness; fainting; rapid heartbeat or sudden weakness.Physicians should refer patients to the patient guide regarding risks occurring during or after implantation of the device.Procedure-related risks include cardiac, pulmonary, neurologic, bowel and bleeding complications.Device-related risks include occlusion, endoleak, aneurysm enlargement, fracture, potential for reintervention and open surgical conversion, rupture, and death (see section 5.1, observed adverse events and section 5.2, potential adverse events).The physician should complete the patient i.D.Card and give it to the patient so that he/she can carry it with him/her at all times.The patient should refer to the card anytime he/she visits additional health practitioners, particularly for any additional diagnostic procedures (e.G., mri).11.1.7 main body proximal (top) deployment 4.Deploy the suprarenal stent by advancing the top cap inner cannula 1 to 2 mm at a time while controlling the position of the main body until the top stent is fully deployed.(fig.15 and 16) advance the top cap cannula an additional 1 to 2 cm and then retighten the pin vise to avoid contact with the deployed suprarenal stent.Note: if unable to fully deploy suprarenal stent by advancing the top cap inner cannula, see section 14.2, suprarenal stent deployment troubleshooting.Note: once the barbed suprarenal stent has been deployed, further attempts to reposition the graft are not recommended.Warning: the zenith flex aaa endovascular graft incorporates a suprarenal stent with fixation barbs.Exercise extreme caution when manipulating interventional devices in the region of the suprarenal stent.12 imaging guidelines and postoperative follow-up ¿ the long-term performance of endovascular grafts has not yet been established.All patients should be advised that endovascular treatment requires lifelong, regular follow-up to assess their health and performance of their endovascular graft.Patients with specific clinical findings (e.G., endoleaks, enlarging aneurysms or changes in the structure or position of the endovascular graft) should receive additional follow-up.Patients should be counseled on the importance of adhering to the follow-up schedule, both during the first year and at yearly intervals thereafter.Patients should be told that regular and consistent follow-up is a critical part of ensuring the ongoing safety and effectiveness of endovascular treatment of aaas.¿ physicians should evaluate patients on an individual basis and prescribe their follow-up relative to the needs and circumstances of each individual patient.The recommended imaging schedule is presented in table 12.1.1.This schedule was used in the pivotal trial and is recommended even in the absence of clinical symptoms (e.G., pain, numbness, weakness).Patients with specific clinical findings (e.G., endoleaks, enlarging aneurysms or changes in the structure or position of the stent graft) should receive follow-up at more frequent intervals.¿ the combination of contrast and non-contrast ct imaging provides information on aneurysm diameter change, endoleak, patency, tortuosity, progressive disease, fixation length and other morphological changes.¿ duplex ultrasound imaging may provide information on aneurysm diameter change, endoleak, patency, tortuosity, and progressive disease.In this circumstance, a non-contrast ct should be performed to use in conjunction with the ultrasound.Ultrasound may be a less reliable and sensitive diagnostic method compared to ct." evidence provided by the customer, complaint history, device failure analysis, device history record, manufacturing documents, and verification testing, suggests that the device was manufactured to specification.There is no evidence of nonconforming devices in house or in the field.Based on the information provided, expert review of medical imaging provided by the facility, and the results of our investigation, cook could not determine a definitive cause for the reported failure.And while the cause in this case is not known, it is possible the medical procedure may have contributed to this incident.The image reviewer noted, ¿the aneurysm neck length was just inside the ifu however only a third of its available length was utilized.Although this low position was recognized, the sealing stent was implanted over twice as low as stated in the report narrative.The tffb was reportedly implanted 4-5mm lower than intended.A proximal extension was considered but decided against because a seal was achieved on completion angiography.The sealing stent is nearly unsupported.The barb separation and the stent apex fracture is indicative of increased stress in the absence of seal zone support.¿ the appropriate personnel have been notified.Cook will continue to monitor for similar complaints.Per the risk assessment no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Event Description
No additional information regarding the patient and/or event has been received since the previous medwatch report was sent.
 
Event Description
Additional information was provided on 29feb2024.An "in house planning and sizing" sheet from the computed tomography (ct) scan dated (b)(6) 2017 was provided.The maximum aneurysm diameter was 66 mm.The neck length was 16 mm.The neck diameters were 26 mm (upper), 26 mm (mid) and 27 mm (lower).The length from the renal artery to the aortic bifurcation was 108 mm.The right common iliac artery measured 75 mm in length and 22 mm in diameter.The left common iliac artery measured 65 mm in length and 20 mm in diameter.The superior mesenteric artery (sma) and celiac artery (ca) were both patent.The left renal artery was the lowest in position.The patient had one left and one right renal artery.Cc tilt was 15 mm.The devices intended for implantation were tffb-32-82-zt, zsle-24-74 (right), zsle-24-90 (left).During the procedure the following devices were implanted/used: tffb-32-82-zt, zsle-24-90-zt & zsle-24-74-zt, a cook coda molding balloon was used in the proximal neck of the device.Procedural notes were provided: "incision: bilateral oblique groin incisions procedure: the common femoral arteries (cfa)s were isolated bilaterally and "slooped." 5 french sheaths via the left and right common femoral arteries (cfas) were inserted.5000 units of intravenous (iv) heparin was given.Stable wire access with a lunderquist wire (via the right groin) in the ascending aorta and a pigtail catheter via the left groin positioned at lumbar vertebrae (l1).The main body graft was inserted via the patient's right side.Magnified views of the renal arteries were obtained in anterior posterior (ap) projection with cranial tilt.The zenith flex aaa endovascular graft bifurcated main body (rpn: tffb 32 82 zt) was positioned below left renal artery after imaging confirmed position.The contralateral limb of the zenith flex aaa endovascular graft bifurcated main body was deployed and the top cap was released.On release of the top cap it was clear that the stent-graft had "jumped" distally and ended up deployed approximately 4-5 mm lower than planned.Given that i (physician) had measured this as a short neck abdominal aortic aneurysm (aaa), i (physician) was concerned that seal may not be achieved.I (physician) called for advice and help from my colleague.I (physician) proceeded to complete the endovascular aortic repair (evar) as planned.The contralateral limb was cannulated with confirmation by the pigtail catheter in two positions.Passage of a further lunderquist wire via left the patient's left.The left limb completed after calibrated run via left.A marking angiogram was performed in right anterior oblique (rao) to demonstrate the left iliac bifurcation.The zenith flex with spiral-z technology aaa endovascular graft iliac leg, rpn: zsle-24-90-zt was deployed.The left internal iliac artery (iia) remained patent.The ipsilateral limb of the main body graft was completed.The top cap recovered under fluoroscopic guidance.The right iliac bifurcation was displayed in left anterior oblique (lao) with a calibrated catheter and then a zenith flex with spiral-z technology aaa endovascular graft iliac leg rpn: zsle-24-74-zt was deployed deployed.The right internal iliac artery (iia) remained patent.A cook coda balloon was used to mold the proximal neck as well as distal sealing and overlap zones.Completion angiography demonstrated no graft related endoleaks and patent renal and iliac arteries bilaterally.The initial run had the superior mesenteric artery (sma) overlying the right side of the aortic neck.The consultant radiologist and i (physician) reviewed this and the consultant pointed out that a off centered run should be performed.This confirmed no proximal endoleak.Although the graft had been deployed lower than intended based on the left renal artery, seal had been achieved.Additional procedures were not felt to be required as there was a discussion among clinicians.The over-sizing of the main body had allowed an endovascular seal to be achieved.All devices were removed safely and sutures were used to repair arteriotomies.The patient had palpable bilateral posterior tibial pulses at the end of the procedure.A type ii endoleak was first noted in 2022 and no secondary intervention was performed.Given the patient' s fitness it was decided that conservative management was indicated.The patient has not had any trauma or any reinterventions since the implantation of the cook grafts.The patient was called back into the physician's office due to a stent fracture in the proximal stent.The patient and his family attended an appointment on (b)(6) 2024.The patient declined a secondary intervention and his family was in agreement.The patient was asymptomatic and the physician stated that the it is possible that things will not progress with his stent graft and the existing seal in the short term.The long term durability remains a concern, but the patient accepts the concern.The patient was reported to be grateful for the protection from aneurysm rupture that has been provided since 2017.No intervention was planned by the physician as the patient is not a candidate for secondary intervention.The patient will remain in the surveillance program.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned or that a death or serious injury occurred; nor is it admission that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unavailable, or unchanged.Annex a investigation ¿ evaluation cook was informed on 01apr2024 of barb separation from the suprarenal stent tffb-32-82-zt.The event was discovered during the investigation process when the imaging was being reviewed.There were no changes made to the conclusions upon completion of the investigation into the barb separation from the suprarenal stent.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Event Description
No additional information regarding patient and/or event details has been received since the previous medwatch report was sent.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ZENITH FLEX AAA ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT BIFURCATED MAIN BODY
Type of Device
MIH SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer (Section G)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer Contact
jason crouch
750 daniels way
bloomington, IN 47404
8123392235
MDR Report Key18760301
MDR Text Key336014981
Report Number1820334-2024-00250
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MIH
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P020018
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 05/17/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/25/2017
Device Model NumberN/A
Device Catalogue NumberTFFB-32-82-ZT
Device Lot Number6220053
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/15/2024
Initial Date FDA Received02/22/2024
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received02/29/2024
04/01/2024
05/15/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/05/2024
04/26/2024
05/17/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured09/25/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
2/0 VICRYL; 3/0 MONOCRYL; 5'0 PROLENE; COOK CODA BALLOON; COOK RPN: ZSLE 24-90-ZT, LOT: 7689742; COOK RPN: ZSLE-24-74-ZT, LOT: 7595993
Patient Age82 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-