• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG PROGAV 2.0 WITH SHUNTASSISTANT 2.0 25; HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG PROGAV 2.0 WITH SHUNTASSISTANT 2.0 25; HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT Back to Search Results
Model Number FX643T
Device Problems Mechanical Problem (1384); Infusion or Flow Problem (2964)
Patient Problem Hydrocephalus (3272)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that a progav 2.0 shuntsystem (#fx643t) was implanted during a procedure.According to the complainant, , the shunt system caused an underdrainage and had adjustment difficulties.The patient underwent a revision procedure.The complainant device was returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.No patient complications were reported as a result of the revision procedure.Age: 1 year, 5 months.Height: 68 cm.Weight: 10.8 kg.Gender: male.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation: visual inspection: during the investigation, deposits on the device were determined.Permeability test: a permeability test has shown that all components are permeable.Computer controlled test: to investigate the claim of under-drainage, the opening pressure is measured using a miethke computer controlled testing apparatus which simulates a cerebrospinal fluid flow.The valves are tested in both the horizontal as well as the vertical positions.The results show that the valves operate within the permissible tolerance in their respective relevant positions.Adjustment test: the progav 2.0 was tested and is not adjustable.Braking force and brake function test: the brake functionality test has shown that the brake function operates as expected.However, the breaking force cannot be measured due to the non-adjustability of the valve.Internal inspection : after dismantling of the valves, deposits were found in both valves.Results : in advance, we would like to point out that the product sent in was not inserted in liquid at the time of delivery.Dried deposits can influence the function of the products, which can affect the results.Despite this, we have examined the valve.Based on our investigation results, we can determine adjustment difficulties in the valve.The determined deposits can be named as the cause for the adjustment difficulties.Organic material in the cerebrospinal fluid can influence the function temporarily and are known side effects in hydrocephalus therapy.We can exclude a defect at the time of release.The shunt system met all specifications of the final inspection when released from christoph miethke gmbh & co.Kg.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROGAV 2.0 WITH SHUNTASSISTANT 2.0 25
Type of Device
HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM  14469
Manufacturer (Section G)
CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM   14469
Manufacturer Contact
joerg knebel
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM   14469
MDR Report Key18762281
MDR Text Key336053761
Report Number3004721439-2024-00035
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JXG
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
K190174
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 02/22/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberFX643T
Device Catalogue NumberFX643T
Device Lot Number20045644
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/05/2024
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received02/22/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/20/2020
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age17 MO
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight10 KG
-
-