Catalog Number 37-IN-0060 |
Device Problem
Fracture (1260)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 01/26/2024 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H2 device evaluation - information provided indicates that the product will be returned for evaluation but has yet to be received.Review of device history records was not possible without lot identity.Two-year complaint history review did not reveal a trend for reports of this nature for this part number.No conclusions can be drawn.Should the product be received, a follow-up medwatch report will be filed.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that a procedure was performed on (b)(6) 2024, utilizing the vault c acdf system.Upon attempted insertion of a screw, the self-retaining driver (37-in-0060) tip broke.The screw was only partially inserted when the tip broke, allowing removal of the screw with a pair of pliers.A second screw was readily available in the set and was successfully to complete the procedure.There was a one (1) minute delay to the procedure.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that a procedure was performed on (b)(6) 2024, utilizing the vault c acdf system.After preparing the disc space, they used a rasp to refine the endplate.Following that, they inserted the implant into the disc and prepared the screw hole.They utilized a straight awl and then a straight drill.Upon attempted insertion of a screw, the self-retaining driver (b)(6) tip broke.The screw was only partially inserted when the tip broke, allowing removal of the screw with a pair of pliers.A second screw was readily available in the set and was inserted utilizing the fixed angle driver (b)(6).Although the screw was implanted successfully, the gears did not rotate properly when trying to insert the screw.There was no patient injury, but there was a slight delay of one (1) minute.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H3 device evaluation - engineering performed a visual inspection of the complaint product.The distal tip of the t8 self-retaining driver, (b)(6), is completely fractured in a plane that is perpendicular to the shaft axis.The cause for the fracture is due to excessive torque experienced during this procedure or due to this and prior high loading conditions that may have results in cracks and manifested itself in this failure.The device history record confirms that the 40 piece lot had been inspected and conform to drawing specifications.Complaint history review did not identify a trend for reports of this nature for this part number.The need for corrective action is not indicated at this time however, complaints will continue to be monitored.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|