Model Number 20000GS |
Device Problem
Difficult to Insert (1316)
|
Patient Problems
Hypovolemic Shock (1917); Perforation of Vessels (2135)
|
Event Date 02/01/2024 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The event is captured by edwards lifesciences under complaint #: (b)(4).The manufacturer's investigation is ongoing.A follow-up report will be submitted when the manufacturer's investigation is complete.It should be noted, the device was implanted in the tricuspid position.At this time, the pascal precision transcatheter valve repair system is only indicated for the native mitral valve in the us, addressing degenerative mitral regurgitation.But, it is approved for both tricuspid and mitral spaces in the region where the procedure was performed.Therefore, deployment in the tricuspid position will not be considered off-label in this case.
|
|
Event Description
|
Edwards received notification of a pascal precision ace procedure in tricuspid position where during procedure, while inserting the guide sheath (gs), the operator struggled with tortuosity of vena iliaca communis.With a few tries, the patient started to lose blood pressure rapidly.After actions of anesthesia team, it was decided to flush contrast into the vein to check if there are any bleedings.The contrast film showed massive rupture in between vena iliaca communis and vena cava.Physician pulled out the gs and put in a special balloon to stop the bleeding.After consulting with vascular surgeons and ic, patient was taken immediately to or for emergency surgery.The surgery was 7 hours long, a very complex and risky procedure.In discussion after the case, the probable cause of rupture could be to floppy guide wire for this kind of anatomy (standard amplatzer extra stiff).The patient was going to be re-intervened in the near future.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The following sections were updated/corrected/added: h6 and h10.The complaint for difficult to insert device into patient resulting in tissue damage was confirmed with other empirical evidence.As there were no images provided for this adverse event, an imaging evaluation could not be performed.No manufacturing non-conformities were identified from the investigation.Available information suggests that patient conditions (while inserting the guide sheath (gs), the operator struggled with tortuosity of vena iliaca communis), and procedural use (contrast film showed massive rupture in between vena iliaca communis and vena cava, and probable cause of rupture could be to floppy guide wire for this kind of anatomy) (standard amplatzer extra stiff) likely contributed to the adverse event.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|