• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS PATIENT INFORMATION CENTER IX

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS PATIENT INFORMATION CENTER IX Back to Search Results
Model Number 866389
Device Problem No Audible Alarm (1019)
Patient Problems Bradycardia (1751); Asystole (4442); Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 02/22/2024
Event Type  Death  
Manufacturer Narrative
Philips is in the process of obtaining additional information and the complaint is still under investigation.A follow-up report will be submitted upon completion of the investigation.Reporting institution phone: (b)(6).Reporter phone: (b)(6).
 
Event Description
It was reported the system did not recognize a patient event as a red alarm.The patient deteriorted with asystole and bradycardia.The device was in clinical use.An adverse event was reported.The patient expired.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A philips clinical specialist & product support engineer has reviewed the audit logs, which identified the patient had an active asystole alarm from asistolia generada a las 09:57:58 and continued until the ecg leads off generated at 10:43:34 (this is a red level inop as well).The pic was playing a red sound from 09:23:21 onward.The audit log also identified many cannot analyze ecg alarms at 10:24:55, 10:25:51, 10:28:46, 10:29:21, 10:29:31, 10:29:34 during the time in question which may decrease the effectiveness of arrhythmia monitoring.This is described in the st/ar application note: during this inop/technical condition, the arrhythmia analysis continues and an alarm will be announced if an alarm condition is met.Since the cannot analyze ecg inop/technical alarm indicates that the effectiveness of the arrhythmia monitoring for the patient is compromised, a quick response to this alarm is important.Multiple instances are also seen where the staff interacted with the pic to capture the 12 lead several different times, but no one acknowledged the asystole alarm from 09:57:58.The asystole alarm ended at 11:11:07 when the device was no longer connected to the pic ix.Based on the information provided to philips, it was determined that there was no product malfunction, and the device was functioning as intended.There was an active asystole alarm from 09:57:58, there was no further alarm at 10:23:34.The cause of the reported problem was an active asystole alarm that was not acknowledged.The investigation concludes that no further action is required at this time.If additional information is received the complaint file will be reopened.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PATIENT INFORMATION CENTER IX
Type of Device
PATIENT INFORMATION CENTER IX
Manufacturer (Section D)
PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS
3000 minuteman rd
andover MA 01810
Manufacturer (Section G)
PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS
3000 minuteman rd
andover MA 01810
Manufacturer Contact
hisham alzayat
3000 minuteman rd
andover, MA 01810
6172455900
MDR Report Key18799093
MDR Text Key336459910
Report Number1218950-2024-00142
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MHX
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeSP
PMA/PMN Number
K183387
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial,Followup
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number866389
Device Catalogue Number866389
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/23/2024
Initial Date FDA Received02/28/2024
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received03/13/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/03/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/29/2018
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Death;
Patient Age63 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-