It was reported this was a mitraclip procedure to treat functional mitral regurgitation (mr) with a grade of 4+.An xtw clip was successfully implanted.To further reduce mr, an xt clip prep per ifu and was inserted.While positioning the clip, "gross movements" were made and undone.After evaluation of the fluoroscopic and echocardiographic imaging, the clip was visualized sub valvular in the lateral commissure.This caused the the first clip to detach from the anterior leaflet and remained attached to the posterior leaflet (single leaflet device attachment/slda).It was noted that oxygen started to desaturate.A balloon pump was inserted to keep vitals stable.Further attempts were made to stabilize the slda but were unsuccessful.It was then observed, the first clip completely detached and embolized in the descending aorta.A snared was inserted and the clip was retracted and secured at the groin.The patient then underwent a surgical operation to replace the mitral valve.However, during the procedure, the patient expired.
|
The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history did not indicate a lot-specific quality issue.Based on available information, the reported incomplete coaptation (slda, single leaflet device attachment), associated with clip detachment from the anterior leaflet, was due to interaction with another clip being attempted.The reported device damaged by another device (dislodged), associated with the clip-to-clip interaction, was due to gross movement being made during positioning of another clip.The reported expulsion (ccd, complete clip detachment) appears to be related to the slda as the clip was destabilized.The reported hypoxia (oxygen desaturation after the slda) was related to worsened mr from the slda.The reported device embolism was a result of the clip detachment.The reported death was related to the embolization of the complaint clip.The reported patient effects of embolism and death, as listed in the mitraclip system instructions for use, are known possible complications associated with mitraclip procedures.The reported unexpected medical interventions, removal of foreign body, and surgical intervention were results of case-specific circumstances.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design, or labeling.The event was further reviewed by an abbott medical affairs team.The reviewer stated the following: the patient had initial successful xtw @ a2/p2 for fmr; a second clip (xt) was passed below the valve to treated residual medial mr.Grasp was successful, however, there was mr between clips and the xt was released and passed laterally.From the rfi, it seems that the entire system was advanced laterally, however, the lateral movement was more pronounced than intended and the xtw (first clip) was released from the amvl (slda).The xt was noted to be in the lateral commissure.The patient's mr worsened and an iabp was inserted due to hemodynamic instability.Attempts to stabilize the xtw led to embolization of that clip to the aorta necessitating snaring and retrieval to the femoral vein (not removed entirely).It was decided to proceed to urgent open-heart surgery.The patient died during the procedure.The cause of death was due to the intra-procedural clip embolization which caused a cascade of events requiring urgent open-heart surgery which the patient did not survive.No obvious clip malfunction was noted.No imaging provided.
|