A physician reported that no aspiration, cassette with the presumed blockage and suture was used to close wound as a precaution.The surgery was completed after replacing with cassette.The procedure type was unknown.There was no patient harm.Additional information was received from physician that no aspiration, cassette with the presumed blockage and suture was used to close wound as a precaution during cataract surgery.
|
The customer did not retain the finished goods lot number specific to this event; therefore, device history record and lot history could not be reviewed.A sample was expected but has not been returned to date.The customer should be reminded the directions-for-use state good clinical practice dictates the testing for adequate irrigation and aspiration flow prior to entering the eye no sample has been returned for evaluation; therefore, the condition of the product could not be verified.There was also no specific images or evidence provided to ascertain causality and confirm this reported event.The root cause of the customer's complaint could not be conclusively determined as a sample was not received and the condition of the product could not be verified.As the root cause is unknown, the relationship, if any, of the device to the reported incident cannot be determined.The root cause for this complaint is not known, therefore, specific action with regards to this complaint cannot be taken.Current tracking indicates no adverse trend for this lot for this event.In-process controls are established to ensure each final assembled cassette is verified that all required tests have been performed and all acceptance criteria are met prior to release.Quality assurance has reviewed this complaint and will continue to monitor data for evidence of adverse trending and take further action, as appropriate.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|