Model Number 3501 |
Device Problems
High impedance (1291); Material Integrity Problem (2978)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 01/17/2024 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient was hearing beeping for about three weeks.An office follow-up found the electrode impedance was high and out of range.The impedance data changed abruptly from in-range to out-of-range this past january.An xray was done, and an electrode fracture was confirmed.The doctor is aware.There were no adverse patient effects.The electrode remains implanted.
|
|
Event Description
|
This supplemental report is being filed to provide additional information that the product has been explanted and replaced.The doctor elected to explant both the pulse generator and the electrode.Both products were successfully replaced.There were no additional adverse patient effects.It was reported that the patient was hearing beeping for about three weeks.An office follow-up found the electrode impedance was high and out of range.The impedance data changed abruptly from in-range to out-of-range this past january.An xray was done, and an electrode fracture was confirmed.The doctor is aware.There were no adverse patient effects.The electrode remains implanted.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The electrode was returned severed at approximately 325mm from the terminal end.Upon receipt at our post market quality assurance laboratory, this electrode was thoroughly inspected and analyzed.Resistance testing confirmed the electrode was fractured and visual examination determined the fracture was located approximately 325mm from the terminal pin, (in the notch area adjacent to the sense b electrode).Based on the analysis results, the fracture appears to be the result of cyclic fatigue at the fracture site.In december 2020, boston scientific issued a field safety notice regarding the potential for emblem s-icd subcutaneous electrodes to exhibit a lead body fracture just distal to the proximal sense ring.This electrode is a part of the advisory population.
|
|
Event Description
|
This supplemental report is being filed to provide additional information regarding product analysis.This supplemental report is being filed to provide additional information that the product has been explanted and replaced.The doctor elected to explant both the pulse generator and the electrode.Both products were successfully replaced.There were no additional adverse patient effects.It was reported that the patient was hearing beeping for about three weeks.An office follow-up found the electrode impedance was high and out of range.The impedance data changed abruptly from in-range to out-of-range this past january.An xray was done, and an electrode fracture was confirmed.The doctor is aware.There were no adverse patient effects.The electrode remains implanted.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|