• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SHIRAKAWA OLYMPUS CO., LTD. EVIS EXERA II ULTRASOUND GASTROVIDEOSCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SHIRAKAWA OLYMPUS CO., LTD. EVIS EXERA II ULTRASOUND GASTROVIDEOSCOPE Back to Search Results
Model Number GF-UCT180
Device Problems Material Separation (1562); Failure to Clean Adequately (4048)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 02/18/2024
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was returned, and the evaluation found no malfunctions aside from the allegation reported in b5.Should additional relevant information become available, a supplemental report will be submitted.
 
Event Description
It was observed that during the device evaluation, the gastrovideoscope instrument channel was clogged with foreign material and there was a gap between the acoustic lens and ultrasound probe.There were no reports of patient involvement.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being supplemented to provide additional information based on the legal manufacturer's final investigation.A review of the device history record found no deviations that could have caused or contributed to the reported issue.Based on the results of the investigation, it is likely that the foreign object in phenomenon 1 "stent is stuck in instrument channel" may not be removed due to physical damage to the device but a probable cause could not be determined.Additionally, it is likely that phenomenon 2 "there is a gap between acoustic lens and ultrasound probe" occurred due to wear and tear or damage with customer mishandling and with increasing use/time.The event can be detected/prevented by following the instructions for use which state: chapter 6 compatible reprocessing methods and chemical agents chapter 7 cleaning, disinfection, and sterilization procedures in addition, according to the instruction manual, there is the following description regarding the handling of the actual product.This may prevent the phenomenon."do not strike, hit, or drop the endoscope¿s distal end, insertion tube, bending section, control section, universal cord, or endoscope connector.Also, do not bend, pull, or twist the endoscope¿s distal end, insertion tube, bending section, control section, universal cord, or endoscope connector with excessive force.The endoscope may be damaged and could cause patient injury, burns, bleeding, and/or perforations.It could also cause parts of the endoscope to fall off inside the patient".Olympus will continue to monitor field performance for this device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EVIS EXERA II ULTRASOUND GASTROVIDEOSCOPE
Type of Device
ULTRASOUND GASTROVIDEOSCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
SHIRAKAWA OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
3-1 okamiyama
odakura, nishigo-mura,
nishishirakawa-gun, fukushima 961-8 061
JA  961-8061
Manufacturer (Section G)
SHIRAKAWA OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
3-1 okamiyama
odakura, nishigo-mura,
nishishirakawa-gun, fukushima
Manufacturer Contact
todd brill
800 west park drive
westborough, MA 01581
5082077661
MDR Report Key18817004
MDR Text Key337743233
Report Number3002808148-2024-01952
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code ODG
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
K093395
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/26/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Other
Device Model NumberGF-UCT180
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/21/2024
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/23/2024
Initial Date FDA Received03/01/2024
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received03/13/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/26/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/16/2020
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-