Reportable based on device analysis completed on (b)(6) 2024.It was reported that the coil could not move forward and withdraw difficultly, resulting the coil stretched after withdrawal.The target lesion was located in the internal iliac artery.A 12mm x 40cm interlock-35 was selected for use.During the procedure, before advancing, the coil was flushed with heparin.When the coil advanced 10cm, the coil could not move forward and withdraw difficultly, resulting the coil stretched after withdrawal.The device was completed with another of the same device.No complications were reported, and the patient was stable post procedure.However, device analysis revealed that the arm coil was detached.
|
Device evaluated by mfr: the device was returned for evaluation.It was observed that the main coil and the introducer sheath were returned.It was observed that the main coil was bent and stretched at the coil arm and primary coil section.Also, the arm coil was detached.A part of the original box was returned, and it was observed that the pouch information matches with the complaint information.No more damages were observed.The functional could not be performed due the main coil and the pusher wire are not interlocking.Dimensional inspection of the main coil revealed the components were within specifications.No other issues were identified during the product analysis.
|