• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS INC US PFC*SIGMA C/S NPOR FEM RT SZ 4; KNEE FEMORAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS INC US PFC*SIGMA C/S NPOR FEM RT SZ 4; KNEE FEMORAL Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 960054
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Foreign Body Reaction (1868); Joint Laxity (4526); Unspecified Tissue Injury (4559)
Event Date 01/25/2024
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Hcp sent a medical info request to team: "i have a patient in the clinic who has developed symptoms since several weeks after implantation of a pfc modular plus prosthesis.Surgical date (b)(6) 2008: pfc modular right knee: femur cemented, size 4, tibia cemented, size 3, plateau height 10 mm stabilized; patellum shaping.The patient now presents and the images show the inlay as worn/defective with a defect on the dorsal medial tibial console and ventral subluxation of the tibia to the femur.It is clear that there will be a certain amount of metallosis with a dorsally rubbed tibial component.As the manufacturer, is it still permissible to change the inlay alone in the case of a dorsally impaired tibial component?".
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint (b)(4).D4: the device catalog number is unknown; therefore, udi is unavailable.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803 (and/or part 4, as applicable).This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information, which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained, that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received.No allegation against patella.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary: according to the information received, "hcp sent a medical info request to team: "i have a patient in the clinic who has developed symptoms since several weeks after implantation of a pfc modular plus prosthesis.Surgical date (b)(6) 2008: pfc modular right knee: femur cemented, size 4, tibia cemented, size 3, plateau height 10 mm stabilized; patellum shaping.The patient now presents and the images show the inlay as worn/defective with a defect on the dorsal medial tibial console and ventral subluxation of the tibia to the femur.It is clear that there will be a certain amount of metallosis with a dorsally rubbed tibial component.As the manufacturer, is it still permissible to change the inlay alone in the case of a dorsally impaired tibial component?"".The product was not returned to depuy synthes, however photos were provided for review.See attachment ((b)(4) x-rays).The x-ray investigation revealed nothing indicative of a device nonconformance.Since the device was not returned, a dimensional inspection cannot be performed.The overall complaint was unconfirmed as the observed condition of the pfc*sigma c/s npor fem rt sz 4 would not contribute to the reported adverse event.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the reported complaint condition.As part of depuy synthes quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Device history lot: 1) quantity manufactured: (b)(4).2) date of manufacture: 23-oct-2007.3) any anomalies or deviations identified in dhr: no.4) expiry date: 5/2/2014.5) ifu reference: ifu-0902-00-252.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Type of Device
KNEE FEMORAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS INC US
700 orthopaedic drive
warsaw IN 46581 0988
Manufacturer (Section G)
JTE WARSAW MFG SITE
700 orthopaedic drive
warsaw IN
Manufacturer Contact
kate karberg
700 orthopaedic dr.
warsaw, IN 46581-0988
3035526892
MDR Report Key18825866
MDR Text Key336774299
Report Number1818910-2024-04912
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JWH
UDI-Device Identifier10603295232384
UDI-Public10603295232384
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
K971189
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/04/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/02/2014
Device Catalogue Number960054
Device Lot Number2479227
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/22/2024
Initial Date FDA Received03/04/2024
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received03/13/2024
05/17/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/19/2024
05/20/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured10/23/2007
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
PFC SIGMA STAB INS SZ3 10MM; PFC SIGMA TIB TRAY CEM SZ3; PFC*SIGMA/OV DOME PAT 3 PEG,32; UNKNOWN KNEE TIBIAL INSERT; UNKNOWN KNEE TIBIAL TRAY
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-