• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK IRELAND LTD EVOLUTION® DUODENAL CONTROLLED-RELEASE STENT - UNCOVERED; MUM STENT, METALIC EXPANDABLE, DUODENAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK IRELAND LTD EVOLUTION® DUODENAL CONTROLLED-RELEASE STENT - UNCOVERED; MUM STENT, METALIC EXPANDABLE, DUODENAL Back to Search Results
Catalog Number EVO-22-27-9-D
Device Problem Material Twisted/Bent (2981)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 02/05/2024
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
The stent failed to deploy and had to open another stent for the same patient and the second stent was deployed successfully with no issues."as per cc form": the stent failed to deploy.Patient outcome: a section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.Patient/event info - notes: 1.At what stage of the procedure did the complaint occur? when unpacking or preparing the evolution, while inserting the evolution in the patient, during stent placement, while removing the introducer, or during stent repositioning/removal.During stent deployment, trigger wouldn¿t squeeze 2.What endoscope type and channel size was used? therapeutic duodenoscope, olympus.3.What was the position of the elevator? n/a, open, closed.Open 4.Details of the wire guide used (diameter, type, make)? bsc jag wire 0.035" 5.Was the zip port facing upwards and slightly curved when backloading the wire guide? n/a, yes, no.Na 6.Did any part of the stent contact the patient¿s anatomy when the complaint occurred? n/a, yes, no.No 7.Please advise the anatomical location of the intended target site.Duodenum.8.How long was the stent in the patient by the time this complaint occurred? na 9.For devices where the ifu states for longer term patency has not been established, was periodic evaluation completed? n/a, yes, no.Na 10.If yes, how often was this completed? 11.Did the patient require any additional procedures as a result of this event? n/a, yes, no.Another stent.12.What intervention (if any) was required? 13.Was the secondary intervention performed during the same procedure as the device failure or was it scheduled for another day? n/a, same procedure, another day another stent same day.14.Were any other defects (other than the complaint issue) observed on the device prior to return (e.G.Kink)? n/a, yes, no.No.15.If yes, please specify what was observed and where on the device it was observed.Stricture information: na.1.What was the length and diameter of the stricture? 2.Where was the stricture located in the body? 3.Was there resistance felt passing wire guide through stricture? n/a, yes, no.4.Was there resistance felt passing the evolution through stricture? n/a, yes, no.5.Was the stricture dilated before stent placement? n/a yes, no.Questions related to during insertion into patient.1.Was the product inspected for kinks or damage before use? n/a, yes, no.Yes.2.Was resistance felt during insertion into patient? n/a, yes, no.No 3.If yes, at what point? questions related to during stent placement.1.Did the product fail during stent deployment or recapture? n/a, deployment, recapture, other.During deployment.2.If other, please specify.3.Was the directional button pressed during use? n/a, yes, no.No.4.Was any part of the stent observed in contact with the patient¿s anatomy at the time of failure? n/a, yes, no.Didn¿t deploy.5.Was the yellow marker kept in view during deployment? n/a, yes, no.Na 6.Are images of the device or procedure available? n/a, yes, no].No.Questions related to during introducer withdrawal.1.Are images of the device or procedure available? n/a, yes, no.No.2.Was final stent placement confirmed using endoscopy / fluoroscopy? n/a, yes, no.Na.3.If yes, what was used? 4.Did the stent open sufficiently to allow withdrawal of introducer safely? n/a, yes, no.Na 5.Was the safety wire fully removed before removing the delivery system? n/a, yes, no.Na 6.Did any part of the product snag/get caught with the stent when removing the delivery system? n/a, yes, no.Na.Questions related to during stent repositioning/removal (for evo-fc & evo-pc devices) na 1.What instrument was used for stent repositioning / removal? forceps, snare, other.2.If other, please specify.3.Was resistance encountered during advancement and/or deployment? n/a, yes, no.4.If yes, please when this was felt? advancement or deployment.5.How did the physician deal with this resistance? 6.Was the lasso (suture) loop used during repositioning.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Pma/510(k) # k163468.Investigation is still pending, a follow up mdr will be submitted to include the investigation conclusions.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EVOLUTION® DUODENAL CONTROLLED-RELEASE STENT - UNCOVERED
Type of Device
MUM STENT, METALIC EXPANDABLE, DUODENAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK IRELAND LTD
o halloran road
limerick
Manufacturer (Section G)
COOK IRELAND LTD
o halloran road
national technology park
limerick
Manufacturer Contact
sinead o'leary
o halloran road
national technology park
limerick 
MDR Report Key18835842
MDR Text Key337868593
Report Number3001845648-2024-00079
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MUM
UDI-Device Identifier10827002480268
UDI-Public(01)10827002480268(17)251102(10)C2109234
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 02/07/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberEVO-22-27-9-D
Device Lot NumberC2109234
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Distributor Facility Aware Date02/05/2024
Event Location Hospital
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/06/2024
Initial Date FDA Received03/05/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured11/02/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-