Model Number 20000ISM |
Device Problem
Difficult to Insert (1316)
|
Patient Problems
Pericardial Effusion (3271); Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms, Conditions Term / Code Not Available (4581)
|
Event Date 02/09/2024 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
Edwards received notification of a pascal precision ace procedure in mitral position.During procedure the patient suffered a pericardial effusion.The patient needed treatment of a severe mitral regurgitation (mr).The heart and especially the right atrium were massively enlarged, which made puncture of the septum difficult.This was finally successful, and a stiff wire was inserted into the left atrium.In retrospect, physician said that he was not sure whether the wire had temporarily pierced the myocardium.However, there were no hemodynamic signs of injury, so the procedure was continued.The first ace was implanted satisfactorily but was not sufficient to adequately treat the mr.When the second device was steered down, there was brief contact with the atrial wall between the superior pulmonary vein and the atrial appendage.The device stalled briefly, and contact was made.Afterwards, the physician reported that the contact was probably not sufficient to damage the heart wall.The second device was implanted satisfactorily after a small correction.A little later, the anesthesiologist pointed out that the frequency had risen to 140-150bpm and that the pressure had dropped at the same time (70/50).A pericardial effusion was visible in the echo.The administration of catecholamines did not lead to any improvement.The pascal was released, and the pericardial puncture was initiated.A total of 450 ml of blood was drawn and the patient's parameters improved.The patient was stabilized and transferred to the icu.A week after, patient was noted as to be feeling better and recovering.The result of the procedure was stable and still good.Physician's primary suspicion lies in the accidental injury to the heart with the wire.As reported, in case that the wire was the cause for the tamponade it occurred probably in the left atrium.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The event is captured by edwards lifesciences under complaint #: (b)(4).H6 clinical code: hemodynamic instability.The manufacturer's investigation is ongoing.A follow-up report will be submitted when the manufacturer's investigation is complete.H3 other text : implanted.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The following sections were updated/corrected/added: b4, d4, g3, g6, h2, h4, h6 and h10.The complaint for difficult/unable to insert device into transseptal puncture location was confirmed with other empirical evidence.No manufacturing non-conformities were identified from the investigation.As there were no images provided for this adverse event, an imaging evaluation could not be performed.There was no allegation of product malfunction reported.Available information suggests that patient conditions (the heart and especially the right atrium were massively enlarged, which made puncture of the septum difficult) and procedural use (in retrospect, physician said that he was not sure whether the wire had temporarily pierced the myocardium.Physician's primary suspicion lies in the accidental injury to the heart with the wire) likely contributed to the adverse event.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|