Model Number L211 |
Device Problems
Signal Artifact/Noise (1036); Connection Problem (2900)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 02/20/2024 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
As no further information concerning this report is expected, our investigation is complete.This investigation will be updated should further information be provided.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that this device was an attempted implant due to continued noise on the atrial channel.Repeated maneuvers to insert and remove the lead from the device header did not resolve the observed interference.The physician suspected there was a connection problem with the device header and therefore, a replacement device was implanted.No adverse patient effects were reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The returned device was thoroughly inspected and analyzed upon receipt at our post market quality assurance laboratory.Visual examination of the device header and case noted no anomalies.Dimensional analysis of the header was completed.Each port measured as expected.The device was then exposed to simulated heart load conditions, and the pacing, and sensing functions were tested.Impedance testing was completed, and all measurements were within normal limits.The device operated appropriately with no interruptions in therapy output at the returned programmed settings.A series of electrical tests was also performed, and again, normal device function was observed.Analysis did not identify any device characteristics that would have caused or contributed to the reported clinical observations.As no further information concerning this report is expected, our investigation is complete.This investigation will be updated should further information be provided.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that this device was an attempted implant due to continued noise on the atrial channel.Repeated maneuvers to insert and remove the lead from the device header did not resolve the observed interference.The physician suspected there was a connection problem with the device header and therefore, a replacement device was implanted.No adverse patient effects were reported.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|