It was reported that a patient presented with grade 4 mixed mitral regurgitation (mr) for a mitraclip procedure.One clip was successfully implanted on (b)(6) 2024.The mr was reduced to grade 1.Before deployment, the clip delivery system advanced a bit in the left ventricle, which required tension to be released on the clip.The clip remained stable and well seated after deployment.On (b)(6) 2024, a transthoracic echocardiogram (tte) was performed and a leaflet tear was noted.The clip remained attached to both leaflets, but partially detached from the posterior leaflet.The mr was worsened at grade 4 and the patient experienced dyspnea.Per the physician, the partial detachment was due to how the gripper is arranged on the mitraclip and the account switched to a competitor device due to the issue.A second clip intervention was performed on (b)(6) 2024 with two nt clips successfully implanted.The mr was reduced from grade 4 to 2.
|
The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no similar complaints reported from this lot.Based on available information, the cause of the reported partial clip movement and tissue injury were unable to be determined.The reported gripper arrangement was due to the physician¿s opinion of the device.The reported worsening mr was a cascading event of the reported tissue injury.The reported dyspnea is a cascading event of the reported worsening mr.The reported patient effects of tissue injury, mitral regurgitation, and dyspnea, as listed in the mitraclip system instructions for use, are known possible complications associated with mitraclip procedures.The reported unexpected medical intervention and hospitalization were results of case-specific circumstances.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design, or labeling.
|