Model Number 3501 |
Device Problems
Signal Artifact/Noise (1036); Fracture (1260); Over-Sensing (1438); Inappropriate/Inadequate Shock/Stimulation (1574); Material Integrity Problem (2978)
|
Patient Problem
Shock from Patient Lead(s) (3162)
|
Event Date 04/23/2023 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient received an inappropriate shock from the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (s-icd) while riding a bicycle.The shock was determined to be due to oversensing noise.The physician was concerned over an electrode integrity issue as the noise was able to be replicated during in office testing.Technical services (ts) was consulted to review and noted the noise appeared to be related to myopotential noise.Ts observed the noise may not indicate an electrode issue and suggested performing additional testing and x-ray imaging.Additional information was received that a revision procedure was performed where upon removal of the electrode, the suture sleeve was observed to be cut off of the electrode.Due to concern over a fractured electrode, the lead was removed.A new electrode was implanted; however, the patient did not pass screening in any vector.It was noted that the sensing vectors did not pass with the previous electrode during testing at the revision.Subsequently the entire s-icd system was explanted.Further review of the stored data noted an episode from 10 months earlier with myopotential oversensing leading to an untreated episode.No additional adverse effects were reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This product has not been returned to date.If returned analysis will be performed and this report will be updated.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient received an inappropriate shock from the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (s-icd) while riding a bicycle.The shock was determined to be due to oversensing noise.The physician was concerned over an electrode integrity issue as the noise was able to be replicated during in office testing.Technical services (ts) was consulted to review and noted the noise appeared to be related to myopotential noise.Ts observed the noise may not indicate an electrode issue and suggested performing additional testing and x-ray imaging.Additional information was received that a revision procedure was performed where upon removal of the electrode, the suture sleeve was observed to be cut off of the electrode.Due to concern over a fractured electrode, the lead was removed.A new electrode was implanted; however, the patient did not pass screening in any vector.It was noted that the sensing vectors did not pass with the previous electrode during testing at the revision.Subsequently the entire s-icd system was explanted.Further review of the stored data noted an episode from 10 months earlier with myopotential oversensing leading to an untreated episode.The field representative noted that the clinic did not have any concerns over a device related issue regarding the noise.No additional adverse effects were reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This product has not been returned to date.If returned analysis will be performed and this report will be updated.The returned electrode was returned in two segments.It was thoroughly inspected and analyzed.Resistance tests were completed to assess electrical performance and inner insulation integrity.Measurements throughout these tests were within normal limits.Microscopic inspections of the terminal pin assembly and electrode body found no anomalies.Laboratory analysis did not identify any electrode characteristics that would have caused or contributed to the reported clinical observations.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|