• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION EMBLEM S-ICD; IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR (NON-CRT)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION EMBLEM S-ICD; IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR (NON-CRT) Back to Search Results
Model Number 3501
Device Problems Signal Artifact/Noise (1036); Fracture (1260); Over-Sensing (1438); Inappropriate/Inadequate Shock/Stimulation (1574); Material Integrity Problem (2978)
Patient Problem Shock from Patient Lead(s) (3162)
Event Date 04/23/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that the patient received an inappropriate shock from the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (s-icd) while riding a bicycle.The shock was determined to be due to oversensing noise.The physician was concerned over an electrode integrity issue as the noise was able to be replicated during in office testing.Technical services (ts) was consulted to review and noted the noise appeared to be related to myopotential noise.Ts observed the noise may not indicate an electrode issue and suggested performing additional testing and x-ray imaging.Additional information was received that a revision procedure was performed where upon removal of the electrode, the suture sleeve was observed to be cut off of the electrode.Due to concern over a fractured electrode, the lead was removed.A new electrode was implanted; however, the patient did not pass screening in any vector.It was noted that the sensing vectors did not pass with the previous electrode during testing at the revision.Subsequently the entire s-icd system was explanted.Further review of the stored data noted an episode from 10 months earlier with myopotential oversensing leading to an untreated episode.No additional adverse effects were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This product has not been returned to date.If returned analysis will be performed and this report will be updated.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient received an inappropriate shock from the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (s-icd) while riding a bicycle.The shock was determined to be due to oversensing noise.The physician was concerned over an electrode integrity issue as the noise was able to be replicated during in office testing.Technical services (ts) was consulted to review and noted the noise appeared to be related to myopotential noise.Ts observed the noise may not indicate an electrode issue and suggested performing additional testing and x-ray imaging.Additional information was received that a revision procedure was performed where upon removal of the electrode, the suture sleeve was observed to be cut off of the electrode.Due to concern over a fractured electrode, the lead was removed.A new electrode was implanted; however, the patient did not pass screening in any vector.It was noted that the sensing vectors did not pass with the previous electrode during testing at the revision.Subsequently the entire s-icd system was explanted.Further review of the stored data noted an episode from 10 months earlier with myopotential oversensing leading to an untreated episode.The field representative noted that the clinic did not have any concerns over a device related issue regarding the noise.No additional adverse effects were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This product has not been returned to date.If returned analysis will be performed and this report will be updated.The returned electrode was returned in two segments.It was thoroughly inspected and analyzed.Resistance tests were completed to assess electrical performance and inner insulation integrity.Measurements throughout these tests were within normal limits.Microscopic inspections of the terminal pin assembly and electrode body found no anomalies.Laboratory analysis did not identify any electrode characteristics that would have caused or contributed to the reported clinical observations.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EMBLEM S-ICD
Type of Device
IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR (NON-CRT)
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul MN 55112
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
road 698, lot no. 12
dorado PR 00646 -260
*   00646-2602
Manufacturer Contact
timothy degroot
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul, MN 55112
6515826168
MDR Report Key18885801
MDR Text Key337436282
Report Number2124215-2024-14859
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
P110042/S077
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/16/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Model Number3501
Device Catalogue Number3501
Device Lot Number230816
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/16/2024
Initial Date FDA Received03/12/2024
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received05/07/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/16/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/24/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention; Hospitalization;
-
-