It was reported that, after a tka procedure had been performed on an unknown date, the patient experienced an acute pcl rupture due to hyperextension subsequent of a fall.A revision surgery was performed on an unknown date to address this adverse event, in which a unknown femoral component and insert were exchanged.
|
H3, h6: the device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a device analysis could not be performed.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, per complaint details, a first revision was performed approximately 1 month post left total knee arthroplasty due to an acute posterior cruciate ligament rupture with hyperextension secondary to a fall.The partial procedure note shows the femoral and polythene components were revised to a posterior stemmed system (legion constrained femoral with a cemented stem and 9mm posterior high flex polythene insert).It was communicated that the requested medical documentation was not available.The patient's current health status is unknown.The revision was reportedly due to an acute posterior cruciate ligament rupture secondary to the patient¿s fall/trauma with hyperextension.Patient impact beyond that which was reported cannot be determined.Device specific identifiers were not provided.Therefore, an evaluation of the manufacturing records, complaint history review, risk management file and prior actions could not be performed.A review of the instructions for use documents for knee systems revealed in warnings and precautions, postoperative section that use extreme care in patient handling is needed and postoperative patient care and directions and warnings to patients by physicians are extremely important.Normal daily activity may be resumed at the physician¿s direction.Patients should be directed to seek medical opinion before entering potentially adverse environments that could affect the performance of the implant.At this time, we have no evidence to conclude that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Factors that could contribute to the reported event include traumatic injury, abnormal loading of limb and/or postoperative care.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
|