• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS PATIENT INFORMATION CENTER IX

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS PATIENT INFORMATION CENTER IX Back to Search Results
Model Number 866389
Device Problem Defective Alarm (1014)
Patient Problem Brain Injury (2219)
Event Date 03/05/2024
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
A follow-up report will be submitted upon completion of the investigation.
 
Event Description
The customer biomedical engineer (biomed) reported the clinical staff said that on (b)(6)2024 at approximately 19:00, a 67 year old female patient weighing 70 kg, height is 1.68 m, in rm #234, on the m2 telemetry unit failed to alarm for a desaturation (desat) of 85%; the clinical staff did not hear an alarm.The patient was wearing a mx40 connected to the picix.The patient developed an anoxic brain injury due to the failure to alarm for spo2 desat.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A philips clinical product specialist reviewed the information provided.Based on the information provided the following determination was made.A review of the clinical audit logs revealed many spo2t inoperative (inop) technical alarms occurred for several hours leading up to the event timeframe.Inop alarms included spo2 no pulse, ecg leads off, tele weak signal, leadset unplugged, and noisysignal.Spo2 inops interrupted monitoring but when the value was present it was reported to be within the alarm limit range and therefore did not generate a physiological alarm.The alarms were on and set to 90 and 100 with desat limit of 88.There were no physiological spo2 alarms visible in the audit log during the stated time frame.It was also noted, based on the pictures provided by the visiting support engineer, that non-philips leadsets may be being used.The leadsets shown have not been validated for use with the philips mx40 device.Based on the information available and the testing conducted, the cause of the reported problem was not confirmed.Based on the information provided, there is no indication that the pic ix was not functioning as intended.The audit logs indicated that spo2 inops interrupted monitoring but when the value was present it was reported to be within the alarm limit range and therefore did not generate a physiological alarm.It was also noted, based on the pictures provided by the visiting support engineer, that non-philips leadsets may be being used.The leadsets shown have not been validated for use with the philips mx40 device.The investigation concludes that no further action is required at this time.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PATIENT INFORMATION CENTER IX
Type of Device
PATIENT INFORMATION CENTER IX
Manufacturer (Section D)
PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS
3000 minuteman rd
andover MA 01810
Manufacturer (Section G)
PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS
3000 minuteman rd
andover MA 01810
Manufacturer Contact
hisham alzayat
3000 minuteman rd
andover, MA 01810
6172455900
MDR Report Key18901864
MDR Text Key337626583
Report Number1218950-2024-00191
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MHX
UDI-Device Identifier00884838093041
UDI-Public00884838093041
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K183387
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Biomedical Engineer
Type of Report Initial
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number866389
Device Catalogue Number866389
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/11/2024
Initial Date FDA Received03/14/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Date Device Manufactured01/22/2021
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening;
Patient Age67 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight70 KG
-
-