Summary of the investigation: review of the associated manufacturing record revealed no evidence of inconsistency during the manufacturing process that could be related to the reported issue.The lead was returned cut in two distinct parts, certainly due to a difficult explantation procedure and neither dimensional nor mechanical tests could be performed.The x-rays performed on the returned subject lead confirm that the inner coil and the screw mechanism were free from any damages that could lead to the reported event: lead dislodgement.According to the patient files provided good electrical measurements within normal range were obtained during at the implantation and at the one-week in-clinic follow-up.The detailed data are not available in the provided patient files.Based on available information, and since no x-ray of the lead positioning was provided, the reported dislodgement could not be confirmed with certainly.Lead dislodgement most likely occurred due to external factors that are independent of the lead characteristics, such as physician preferred implant site or patient physiology/anatomy.These issues are well-known potential complications associated to such implantable devices that are discussed in the device instructions-for-use and published literature.This case is retained and utilized for trending purposes.For more details, please refer to the enclosed report analysis.
|