It was reported that a mitraclip procedure was performed to treat degenerative mitral regurgitation (mr) with a grade of 4+, prolapsed posterior leaflet, and restricted posterior leaflet.A mitraclip xtr was inserted but the axis of clip changed after entering the left ventricle, resulting in an aortic hugger.The clip was withdrawn into the left atrium to close the clip.However, the clip suddenly closed, and the clip arm was hooked on part of the anterior lobe.An ultrasound was performed and revealed that the tissue damage occurred.Therefore, the clip was removed from the patient.The clip was inspected outside of the patient, and white valve tissue was observed on the clip arm.The patient¿s valve was damaged.The procedure was discontinued with no clips implanted.The mr remained at grade 4+.
|
All available information was investigated and the reported clip jumpiness and sleeve steering issue were not confirmed via returned device analysis.The reported difficulty/delayed positioning and difficult to remove from anatomy (clip arm hooked on anterior lobe) could not be replicated in a testing environment as it was related to patient/procedural conditions or operational circumstances.The investigation was unable to determine a cause for the reported clip jumping and sleeve steering issue.The reported difficulty/delayed positioning and clip caught on anatomy (anterior lob) appear to be due to the reported sleeve steering issue.The reported tissue injury appears to be related to the clip caught on anatomy.Tissue injury is listed in the instructions for use as a known possible complication associated with the mitraclip procedures.The reported serious injury/illness/impairment was a result of case specific circumstance as no additional intervention was performed.There is no indication of a product issue with respect to manufacture, design, or labeling.
|