H3 a companion product was returned for evaluation but the specific restraint involved in the incident was not returned due to it being involved in a crime.It was reported that a man attacked a group of people in illinois, and one of the people fought back with a hammer and severely injured the patient.He was brought to advocate lutheran general and the man went in for surgery for his injuries sustained, woke up from surgery, and attacked the nurses and security guard.It was reported by the hospital that he was able to get out of the 2532 soft limb holder.The patient was reported as violent when in custody.Through investigation we were not able to determine the type of injuries the nurses or security guard sustained.Of the companion products tested, when the application instructions prescribed in the ifu were followed, the product is functional and will perform as intended.However, if the ifu step 1b.Was not followed where the overhand knot with the excess strap was not present to limit unwanted adjustment, the bed connecting strap exhibited slippage.The ifu contraindications state do not use this device with someone who has continued highly aggressive or combative behavior, self-destructive behavior, or deemed to be an immediate risk to others or to self.In this case the patient was obviously extremely aggressive, and this was not the proper device to be used.Manufacturer reference file (b)(4).
|